Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
** The Official 2019-2020 Dem Debate Thread **

#91

(06-30-2019, 05:12 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(06-30-2019, 04:49 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
That's a pathetic argument. If Iran had asked the US to turn over all of its nuclear weapons to the Ayatollah and execute every American non-Muslim you would be technically correct. You should have learned that "technically correct" has been refuted as a reasonable argument during the Concentration Camp discussion. 

But if I need to spell it out for you (and I wasn't addressing you) let's just say that Iran got everything they could reasonably expect, and more. They got back all of the money being held, (1) sanctions ended, the right to enrich uranium, (2) the right to build a nuclear weapon after ten years and (3) no inspections by the US to verify that they wouldn't be building one before that. Right there is more than any sane person would give them. Then they got an additional pallet of cash as ransom payment.

(1) we had some sanctions against Iran after 2015.  Not as many, but some.
(2) all of the deal provisions ended after 10 years. It would have been renegotiated, perhaps renewed with no changes.  
(3) the IAEA was to do the inspections.  They are trustworthy.  There was no need for the US specifically to them.

Dude... you are so way off in this argument it isn't even funny anymore.

You will literally argue for evil just to be against something Trump has done.

You quite possibly have THE WORST case of TDS ever.

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-sec...ar-program

"The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last week admitted an inconvenient truth. The U.N. watchdog, said Yukiya Amano, has proven unable to verify Iran’s compliance with Section T of the 2015 nuclear deal, which prohibits activities that could contribute to the development of a nuclear explosive device."

"Contrary to widespread media reporting, the IAEA has never fully certified Iran’s compliance with the JCPOA."

The Iran deal was a bad deal made by a bad POTUS backed by a bunch of European idiots who lean on the US to pay for all of the meddling and nonsense that goes on over there.
Iran didn't even fully comply with the "deal" and it did nothing to improve the situation in the Middle East.


It is absolutely laughable that you can even try to defend, not just the deal
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: ** The Official 2019-2020 Dem Debate Thread ** - by Kane - 07-01-2019, 04:47 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!