(09-24-2019, 03:49 PM)B2hibry Wrote:

(09-24-2019, 03:14 PM)mikesez Wrote: We already know that the money Congress wanted to give the Ukraine was being held up by POTUS.  Literally the exact situation described by Biden years earlier.
Either both situations are quid pro quo, or neither is.

The next question is one of motives.  Both Trump and Biden may have done what they did with pure motives, but it's highly unlikely Trump did, and only slightly less unlikely that Biden did.

Then the next question is of harm.  A prosecutor was harmed by what Biden did, and perhaps the Ukraine's justice system as a whole.  No Americans were harmed.  But Hunter Biden, an American who by all accounts did not break American laws, could have been harmed by what Trump did.

Funds being withheld from a corrupt government and the POTUS talking with the "unfreely" elected President of Ukraine versus a VP and his citizen, lawyer son getting a board position in their largest natural gas company with zero experience are not the same situation.

This makes no since when you research and have knowledge of the situation. Is there any wonder you constantly get called out on your claimed party affiliation versus political stances. All parties aside, you make a huge leap of, um, faith in this comment for lack of a better description.

I see you keep going to coke head Hunter and don't acknowledge that Daddy is the main topical law breaker. Of course, there are deeper corruptions at hand that involve not only Joe but Obama as well. Was/is Hunter, a registered agent of Ukraine?
It seems that got Paul Manafort a few years in prison for not being registered, yet no body else was touched. Manafort’s Ukrainian work had been going on for over a dozen years. Manafort worked for the Party of Regions, led by Yanukovych. The Obama consultants worked for Yanukovych’s rival, Yulia Tymoshenko who was known to collude with Putin and other times posed as his opponent. The Clinton consultants lined up with Viktor Yuschenko.