(09-27-2019, 10:32 AM)jj82284 Wrote:

(09-27-2019, 10:09 AM)mikesez Wrote: You're not contradicting anything in the redacted whistleblower report.
The author says he understands how the system usually works, and that multiple people protested that this was being handled in an unusual way.  He says that people who knew more about the call than he did argued with each other, some saying that nothing in the call had a national security sensitivity, but they lost the argument for the moment and it was being treated as if it did have national security sensitivity.  We know now that it did not.  Looks like an attempted cover-up to me.

The president is the ultimate determinate of all chains of classification and security clearance.  It is not a subordinate officers business what he does and does not classify or to what degree!  They call it CHIEF EXECUTIVE FOR A REASON.  My gosh!