(09-27-2019, 07:50 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(09-27-2019, 05:52 PM)B2hibry Wrote: No, Office responsibility (not political), and once again no (DOJ, statutory authority, treaties, and Constitution even say as much).

There are actually U.S. Supreme Court decisions related to the matter of temporarily withholding arms, and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act gives the President broad powers. Pretty sure if arms are being sent to a country you'd like to know whether they are going to support a cause or support a historically corrupt government. But, that aid has already been released. Remember, the Obama administration blocked all loans and aid packages to Ukraine for a period due to corruption. So, all anyone (left) is grasping at is poor Joe Biden the political figure, not the alleged criminal citizen. Don't forget coke head Hunter. There is and has been lawbreaking but it isn't Trump, as you'll slowly learn. Just more exposing the other side and then silence until the new impeachment rally cry...rinse and repeat.

Dems want to push to impeach a President for exposing a crime and then try to elect the very guy who committed it! Can't make this up.

You're being extremely dense.
I already told you I know that the president has many powers.
He is not supposed to abuse any of his powers.
He tried to use some of his powers to hurt a rival's campaign.
Figuring out why a prosecutor in Ukraine was fired four years ago, whether it was a good thing or not, is not a national interest to the US at this time. It is only a political interest to the Republican party.

---

(09-27-2019, 07:13 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: We haven't seen the direct evidence yet, but Biden will most certainly have acted with Obama's approval. I'm sure the media is champing at the bit to identify all the dirty dealings that connect the Obama White House and Clinton campaign to these activities, right?

Oh you! Never change, cutie pie!