(10-01-2019, 02:15 PM)B2hibry Wrote: Just popping in to drop a dime or two.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/...80/photo/1

I'll wager you a ham sandwich that the person Adam Schiff sent was on the taxpayer's payroll.  Schiff wasn't signing his checks.
If you can find that this person actually used their trip to advance the interests of the Democratic party or of Schiff as a candidate, I would be surprised, but, that's not what this little piece of evidence indicates, on its own.

---

(10-01-2019, 01:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(10-01-2019, 01:25 PM)mikesez Wrote: The Mueller probe was over at that point. It had been over for a while.

---

I'm not an attorney either.  I don't have an attorney on retainer.  I get that POTUS has a more complicated job than I do, but he also has a cabinet full of lawyers!  Including a solicitor general that's basically a catch-all for the things other departments don't think is in their wheelhouse.  What's the difference? All of those positions are paid by US taxpayers, are accountable to us, and have specific laws and standards to follow.  A personal lawyer has none of that.  Now the president is entitled to have a personal lawyer if he wants one of course.But the guy should not be looked in on matters of state, only on -get this- *personal* matters.

And there isn't a connection between Crowd Strike and Ukraine.

The entire Russia-gate hoax was a personal matter, as is Russia-gate 2: Ukrainian Boogaloo. Trump is absolutely correct to treat his political opposition in both parties as treacherous, we've already seen their Deep State gambit exposed, and will again.

You don't have to try so hard to make me laugh, I already love you, sweetheart.

---