(10-08-2019, 11:32 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-08-2019, 11:07 AM)B2hibry Wrote: Quite the opposite, actually. Most documentation argues all elected members were to fall into that impeachment/removal category. Unfortunately, since the 1700s, it has not been definitive. One has to question the lack of a process that incorporates the "people" who placed these officers in position to also not be a part of their removal. While not direct, that is how an impeachment is viewed and supported. That is why there is such turmoil right at this very moment. The Dem House is going against precedents, house rules, and founders' intent as written. No matter what side anyone supports, this is an issue that needs to be black and white, or the populace suffers from career politician buy-offs and corruption perception.

Hilarious. 
What are you even trying to say?
The "people" who placed these officers in power?
The electoral college?
You think those guys should be called up again to consider removing Trump?

Of course whatever you're trying to say, it just means at the Democrats are wrong.

Now tell me about the magical thinking or special pleading you use to say that the impeachment in 1998 was correct.

Do the people not vote to elect these officers? In simple terms, that a dolt like you can understand...ALL representatives of the people should put to a vote to begin formal impeachment. Hell, the House even bypassed the Judicial Committee against their own House rules. Right now, this dog and pony is a one sided [BLEEP] show the likes of SNL!

1998 was on the straight and narrow compared to this hack job.

---