(10-09-2019, 02:53 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-09-2019, 01:40 PM)jj82284 Wrote: What part of "i want u to speak to the attorney general" didnt u people understand?  My gosh.  

It is common diplomatic process for the chief executive to introduce members of his cabinet to incoming foreign leaders to facilitate cooperation.

Barr has said he was not aware of the call, but Giuliani was aware of the call.

Mentioning Barr was a fig leaf.

Yes, it would be appropriate to say, "there are a few thing we want your AG to speak to our AG about..". Is appropriate so long as it is vague.

But involving Giuliani, who was a personal lawyer, not a sworn state department official, was not appropriate

You can't cancel out an inappropriate act with an appropriate one.  If your friend walks into the bar with no shirt on, "at least he's wearing shoes" is not a valid defense.  If you rub your junk against a strange female then ask her, "could I please have the next dance?" She's not going to say, "oh you're so polite to say please!". She's going to say "why in the world do you think it's ok to rub your junk on me?"

Where is that written? You may not like it you may not find it to your personal taste but there's nothing inappropriate about the president bring up a specific instance of a potentially corrupt or illegal act as long as it's predicated on evidence. In this particular instance as we keep telling you it was predicated on evidence.

As for the Attorney General being a big lie that's childish the Attorney General of the United States is currently conducting a massive investigation across at least four countries to determine the legality of the origins of the Mueller investigation. That includes if not centered around the Ukraine. As evidenced by the fact that the first thing the president brought up was the DNC server that was given as a reason for investigating the Trump campaign.

And rudygiuliani was brought up by the president of the Ukraine because he had been in contact with the incoming Administration and his team as a liaison on behalf of the state department to establish relations. That's nothing inappropriate. Also he has provided information the he uncovered in his perfectly appropriate perfectly mandated role as the president's defense attorney in said Mueller probe to help guide potential areas of Investigation into potential ukrainian-american corruption during the 2016 election. An election that the Ukrainian government has already determined that they interfered in.

---