(11-14-2019, 05:42 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:

(11-14-2019, 04:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: Sure.  Judicial decisions are opinions supported by facts.  The redacted transcript we have, and the testimony read on Monday, are the facts.  Some of the testimony is more credible than other testimony.  We form an opinion from all of that. Rollerjag formed his.  But your finding will be opinion too.  The members of Congress / Senators will form theirs.

So your whole "President Trump committed an impeachable offense" is based on opinion rather than fact?  The testimony that we've heard so far is nothing more than hearsay and opinion... not "fact".  The "star witness" was supposedly told by a staffer that he overheard a one-way phone conversation.  That's not "fact" it's hearsay and second hand testimony.

So what exactly is the "impeachable offense" that The President committed and where is the evidence?  After all, that's what you claim as well as all of the other leftists and MSM.

For a self-proclaimed "registered republican" you sound an awful lot like the socialist AOC.

What is impeachable and what is not is opinion.  
Criminal law is mostly facts, but this is not criminal law.  It can't be criminal law, as a sitting president can not be prosecuted.
We are discussing "high crimes" here, not mere crimes.  And yes, "high crimes" are a matter of opinion.

Like the Marquis de Lafayette, I didn't change.  Y'all changed.  I differ from AOC in many ways, but I'm not surprised if I agree with her on some stuff.  The whole political world got turned upside down after Trump became the Republican nominee.

---