(11-23-2019, 08:37 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-23-2019, 08:31 PM)jj82284 Wrote: Like demonstrating through court documents that on 2/2/2016 the companies owner had his assets seized by the prosecutor in question?  What about sworn testimony from the prosecutor that was fired?  What about from his successor that biden himself vouched for?  What about billions of dollars in loan guarantees not getting repaid?  What about the younger biden admitting that he neither had expertise in natural gas nor spoke ukrainian?  What about documents showing that shortly after the invasion of crimea hunter bidens college roommate met with then vp before he demanded ukraine hire "experts" to help with natural gas production that would see archer and biden jr. Paid 6 million dollars?  

Naaaaaaaaaaah.  Biden wanted Shokin to do more than reopen the case, seize the guys assets and set up an interview with his son.  Remember that lie?  Lolz.
#whathesaid

I can't follow the story you're trying to tell.
You're either on a higher plane of intelligence and knowledge than me, or a much lower one. There is no need to continue in either case

---

(11-23-2019, 08:23 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Thats not so, the foundation of your whole argument is this flawed and incorrect statement.

Suppose Obama, at some point while he was president, called up Saudi Arabia and said, "I need you to make a statement that you're investigating Dick Cheney.  I need one of your princes to do a hit on CNN saying so."

Would that be OK?