(12-11-2019, 09:05 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(12-11-2019, 08:50 PM)mikesez Wrote: As for the source, I think it was Sondland and Holmes who agreed under oath that the main object was just to make Ukraine's government issue a statement.

Oh, Sondland...right. The guy who changed his sworn testimony after his businesses were doxxed by Left's Outrage Squad? The same Sondland who quoted Trump as saying “I want nothing, want no quid pro quo, tell Zelensky to do the right thing.” in all three versions of his testimony? Yeah, we should totally run Trump right out of town on that one, Lol.

---

(12-11-2019, 09:03 PM)mikesez Wrote: Gordon Sondland's testimony was manufactured?

Well now, I guess that depends on which of his three testimonies you're referring to now doesn't it?

He made his testimony match with that of his colleague Holmes so as to avoid a charge of lying to Congress. if he really believed what he was saying the first time, he would have said, "hey Holmes is lying to Congress! Hey district attorney you should be charging holmes for lying to Congress!"
Now maybe Holmes was lying, and maybe Sondland is a weenie.
sure would be nice if we had the testimony of someone like Pompeo or Bolton to know for sure. Until then the best explanation is that Sondland felt he owed some loyalty to Trump but not enough to potentially face criminal charges. He lied like Trump's people wanted up until the moment that he was afraid of going to jail.

---