(10-31-2019, 03:24 PM)JagsFansince1995 Wrote:

(10-31-2019, 01:50 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: He bolded it for you.  When another poster quotes you and bolds a portion of your post, you should consider that the topic at hand. 

I'll spell it out for you. 

You falsely asserted that a number of posters have an almost religious blind faith in Foles.

That assertion, like 90% of your posting, is complete and utter horse [BLEEP]. 

Who here has exhibited "blind faith" in Foles?  

I'll wait.

Well i guess i misread the post on the MB about Foles should get us to .500 at minimum on this board due to the schedule and/or playoffs.  THATS BLIND FAITH.  I already stated why i feel that is incorrect with no previous history of taking a team with no stars throughout to the same point he took the EAGLES in half a season of games.  Play dumb, its cool.  Point is, fans said he was fragile, me included. and he broke.  Then the excuses came as to why and now we have a 6TH ROUND QB, doing what he was suppose to be doing.  I guess ya'll think that with FOLES we would have an equal or better record on the season at this point in the same situation.  Other than that, i cant explain the lack of common sense.

Now you're just making up your own definition of faith.  
Faith is the firm belief in something for which one has no proof. 

People who speculated Foles might be capable of leading the team to 8-10 wins did not exhibit blind faith.

They looked at what Foles has been able to do recently in the NFL and hypothesized what he'd do here in an offense tailor made for him by his former QB coach. 
Extrapolating an athlete's recent success to predict its continuance is something members of this board do countless times daily here.  That isn't "faith." 
 It's making an educated guess and sharing an opinion.  It's hypothesizing. And this message board is chock full of it. 

You're trying to needlessly insult others opinions that differ from your own and it's just making your stance weaker. 

This would be like me saying  "you had blind faith that Foles would get hurt." 
You simply hypothesized he would get hurt based on him being hurt before. 

Others hypothesized he could be an efficient QB because he's been an efficient QB before.

---