Thought I'd open this up for discussion. This is such a mixed bag, yardage wise we're very much improved. Points wise, not so much.

 

Total: 8th (311 yds/game)

Pass: 7th (201.7 yds/game)

Run: 20th (109.7 yds/game)

 

Points: 25th (28 ppg)

 

For reference, Seattle is allowing 9 ppg and NO is allowing 33.7. Denver, last year allowed 18.5 per game, Seattle 17.3.

---

IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS

I think it is improved, but the ranking may be off a bit because of the whoopin in the second game. Better than listed? I would say it gets better as the season moves forward. Oddly enough, the offense has now become the main worry.

---

It's a shame points off turnovers count against a defense.  It would be interesting where we'd rank without all the points off offensive turnovers.

 

That being said... re: the Ravens, offense puts you up, you have to hold.

 

If offense puts you up by just one point, you let them have zero.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Points per game is the one that matters and that's not good enough. I hope it gets better as the year goes on.

---

That and $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbucks, 

---

It's a shame points off turnovers count against a defense.  It would be interesting where we'd rank without all the points off offensive turnovers.

 

That being said... re: the Ravens, offense puts you up, you have to hold.

 

If offense puts you up by just one point, you let them have zero.

 


I'd say only things like a pick 6 or a fumble recovery shouldn't count against a defense. If it's an INT and the defense gets on the field, then they're responsible to stop them.

---

IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS

That and $5.00 will get you a coffee at Starbucks,

Yoga pants paradise!

---

You either die as a good poster, or live long enough to become the troll.