Yes I meant Matt Cassel, not Ryan Mallett. I don't follow the Pats very much but I do not think you can make the argument that Brady is the GOAT when first of all football is supposed to be the ultimate team game and then you crown 1 person the best ever....that's not how it should be done in my opinion. I also do not agree with having a GOAT at all I mean the game changes. Who knows how Marino would do in todays game or how bad Brady would do if he played in the 80s. However IF the argument had to be made that there HAD to be a GOAT then I would say have they changed the game, Manning did. Manning surely had his issues and Brady surely has his skills. I just don't think you can say that Brady could be the greatest ever while playing under one of the best coaches of all time. Every QB who plays in NE does better than when they are outside. The closest thing to how the Pats are is when Andy Reid would have QBs go from Philly, they rarely did well.

If the argument making Brady the best every is based on his rings (which it seems to be) then how can someone then turn around and say that Marino is better than Eli Manning when Marino has 0 rings and Eli has 2. It just doesn't make sense. Cassel may have won the same number of games but every dog has his day...remember when Bortles made the top 100 list...good times. If you think Brady is the GOAT then that's fine. We don't have to agree, and it doesn't sound like we do. However nothing has been said to change my mind and I doubt that you're going to just suddenly agree with me either.

Good Day, Happy debating :-)

---