Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
2020 edition! Caldwell just got fired and you become GM. Where do you start?

#41

(01-27-2020, 11:57 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(01-27-2020, 03:24 PM)ColoJag Wrote: I would cut Dareus, Bouye, Norwell, Ryan, and Lee which would give us 45 Mil in cap space.

I would then re-sign Yann(21 a year) and then just cheap bargain guys

I'd cut the entire team and pay Yan the entire salary cap and ask him to play iron man football, except at every position.

The kid is THAT good.

[Image: 2l6c36.jpg]
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

(01-28-2020, 01:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:
(01-28-2020, 12:26 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: There is absolute no reason to keep Swaim. He should be one of the first dudes cut along with Ryan and Lee.

Kind-of depends on Gruden's intent for the position group.  Swaim is a solid in-line blocking end that has decent hands and we don't have depth/numbers at the position. So he may be involved in camp if Gruden wants guys with that skillset. I think they can still save over 2 mil by cutting him as late as August if he doesn't meet standards.

I would keep Swaim unless we draft his replacement. I really think Thadeous Moss could be that guy as he is a good inline TE and he can block his backside off and has some pretty decent hands.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSIM9bZmkezB9B4qD2qAtT...IGQHCZIPuA]
Reply

#43

(01-28-2020, 12:26 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(01-28-2020, 12:20 PM)TJBender Wrote: I'd still cut Swaim and Cann't. Swaim is really no better than the much cheaper O'Shaughnessey as a receiver, and blocking specialists at TE are not typically hugely expensive. Cann't, well, just cann't.

Checking Campbell's contract, I rescind my previous restructuring comment. I thought he had two years left on his deal, not one, and converting salary to bonus if there's only one year left accomplishes nothing. I might, however, try to extend his deal by a year primarily with the intent of pushing a chunk of his $15M salary into 2021 as bonus amortization. If he doesn't want to touch his contract, fine. Keep him at his current price and decide after the season if he's got enough football left in him to re-sign.
There is absolute no reason to keep Swaim. He should be one of the first dudes cut along with Ryan and Lee.

I thought Swaim was a good signing at the time but had no idea he had hands of stone and ran slower than Doug Marrone wearing ankle weights. Cut him.
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.
Reply

#44

(01-28-2020, 02:58 PM)Dimson Wrote:
(01-28-2020, 01:06 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: Kind-of depends on Gruden's intent for the position group.  Swaim is a solid in-line blocking end that has decent hands and we don't have depth/numbers at the position. So he may be involved in camp if Gruden wants guys with that skillset. I think they can still save over 2 mil by cutting him as late as August if he doesn't meet standards.

I would keep Swaim unless we draft his replacement.

I think Blank No. 2 would be equally effective at TE.
Reply

#45
(This post was last modified: 01-29-2020, 10:26 AM by Mikey.)

(01-28-2020, 11:29 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: CUTS and KEEPS

Here's local beat writer Hays Carlyon's pretty reasonable take on it:

https://www.1010xl.com/2020/01/28/the-ja...and-keeps/

@So basically Hays just plagiarized the board.@

I agree with a lot of what he said. I make an offer to Dareus, assuming recovery from the surgery is checking out well. However, I fully understand that if a competitive team makes the same offer, he may pack his bags.

I also agree that Swaim is not a cut on the first day of the league year.  don't think his salary is guaranteed, though, so if he doesn't shine in preseason/training camp, he could be an early cut.

Absolutely agree that we can't really afford to cut Bouye, and I don't feel as strongly as some around here that his performance went downhill.

(01-28-2020, 12:46 PM)TJBender Wrote:
(01-28-2020, 12:39 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: I don't like how Hays keeps Jack as the MLB... we need to draft a true MLB to replace him and let him move over

If Isaiah Williams is there at nine, he'd be about the only player I'd stray from a lineman at that pick for.

....am I the only one who is wary of an undersized guy playing MLB? Not sure I want a LB/S tweener there. He could be the smartest football mind in a generation, but I really don't want a guy who gets Doss'd by every RB who breaks through a gap in the DL.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46
(This post was last modified: 01-29-2020, 11:01 AM by TJBender.)

(01-29-2020, 10:21 AM)Mikey Wrote:
(01-28-2020, 11:29 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: CUTS and KEEPS

Here's local beat writer Hays Carlyon's pretty reasonable take on it:

https://www.1010xl.com/2020/01/28/the-ja...and-keeps/

@So basically Hays just plagiarized the board.@

I agree with a lot of what he said. I make an offer to Dareus, assuming recovery from the surgery is checking out well. However, I fully understand that if a competitive team makes the same offer, he may pack his bags.

I also agree that Swaim is not a cut on the first day of the league year.  don't think his salary is guaranteed, though, so if he doesn't shine in preseason/training camp, he could be an early cut.

Absolutely agree that we can't really afford to cut Bouye, and I don't feel as strongly as some around here that his performance went downhill.

(01-28-2020, 12:46 PM)TJBender Wrote: If Isaiah Williams is there at nine, he'd be about the only player I'd stray from a lineman at that pick for.

....am I the only one who is wary of an undersized guy playing MLB? Not sure I want a LB/S tweener there. He could be the smartest football mind in a generation, but I really don't want a guy who gets Doss'd by every RB who breaks through a gap in the DL.

First off, a correction for my dumb [BLEEP] it's Isaiah Simmons, not Williams. My bad. Second, he's not really all that undersized. He's 6'3" 230-ish. Jack is bigger, yeah, but Jack also spends half the game out of position. That's an indictment of Jack, because he's a much better player on the outside. Simmons wouldn't be a Poz back there, but look around the league. Poz-type big MLBs that hit hard and time their 40 with a calendar are quickly going extinct because as tight ends get faster, they're increasingly a liability against the past--just as Poz was towards the end.

Won't lie, I'm also looking at Simmons because of the number of highly-mobile QBs in the AFC right now. Watson, Mahomes, Jackson, just to name a few, especially Watson in the AFC South. If the Jaguars are going to succeed long-term, they'll need someone in the middle who can shadow and keep up with those guys. Simmons is as fast as any of them.

Don't get me wrong, if either Andrew Thomas or Derrick Brown are available here, they'd get my pick over Simmons. If Wirfs, Wills or Kinlaw are here, they'd also have to be considerations, although I'd probably go for Simmons over any of those but Wirfs. Our lines are in bad shape, but if there's a guy out there who can keep Watson and Jackson in the box, you've got to put a premium on that kind of ability in today's AFC.
Reply

#47

(01-28-2020, 03:23 PM)TJBender Wrote:
(01-28-2020, 02:58 PM)Dimson Wrote: I would keep Swaim unless we draft his replacement.

I think Blank No. 2 would be equally effective at TE.

At least as good as Blank No. 1 played last year.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#48

(01-29-2020, 11:00 AM)TJBender Wrote:
(01-29-2020, 10:21 AM)Mikey Wrote: @So basically Hays just plagiarized the board.@

I agree with a lot of what he said. I make an offer to Dareus, assuming recovery from the surgery is checking out well. However, I fully understand that if a competitive team makes the same offer, he may pack his bags.

I also agree that Swaim is not a cut on the first day of the league year.  don't think his salary is guaranteed, though, so if he doesn't shine in preseason/training camp, he could be an early cut.

Absolutely agree that we can't really afford to cut Bouye, and I don't feel as strongly as some around here that his performance went downhill.


....am I the only one who is wary of an undersized guy playing MLB? Not sure I want a LB/S tweener there. He could be the smartest football mind in a generation, but I really don't want a guy who gets Doss'd by every RB who breaks through a gap in the DL.

First off, a correction for my dumb [BLEEP] it's Isaiah Simmons, not Williams. My bad. Second, he's not really all that undersized. He's 6'3" 230-ish. Jack is bigger, yeah, but Jack also spends half the game out of position. That's an indictment of Jack, because he's a much better player on the outside. Simmons wouldn't be a Poz back there, but look around the league. Poz-type big MLBs that hit hard and time their 40 with a calendar are quickly going extinct because as tight ends get faster, they're increasingly a liability against the past--just as Poz was towards the end.

Won't lie, I'm also looking at Simmons because of the number of highly-mobile QBs in the AFC right now. Watson, Mahomes, Jackson, just to name a few, especially Watson in the AFC South. If the Jaguars are going to succeed long-term, they'll need someone in the middle who can shadow and keep up with those guys. Simmons is as fast as any of them.

Don't get me wrong, if either Andrew Thomas or Derrick Brown are available here, they'd get my pick over Simmons. If Wirfs, Wills or Kinlaw are here, they'd also have to be considerations, although I'd probably go for Simmons over any of those but Wirfs. Our lines are in bad shape, but if there's a guy out there who can keep Watson and Jackson in the box, you've got to put a premium on that kind of ability in today's AFC.

Yeah, if we do draft Simmons I'd love to see him deployed in different creative ways to try to take away some big part of the oponents offense. Whether that be mobile QBs like you said, or dynamic receiving TEs, or scat backs coming out the backfield, or even a deep passing game... he seems to have the skill set that could effectively neutralize so many different things.

Of course the big question / worry remains, would our coaching staff actually be creative enough to use him in such a way?
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!