Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump's Budget to Attack Spending

#32

(02-13-2020, 03:35 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(02-13-2020, 12:38 PM)mikesez Wrote: I mean the teaching hospitals should take on more residents, fresh out of med school.  I'm under the impression that teaching hospitals hire residents directly. Whoever hires them, should be incentivized to hire more.  
More residents become more licensed doctors.
More licensed doctors means more supply. 
More supply for the same demand means lower unit cost

The costs of doctors isn’t the problem with medical costs. It’s the testing, exams, equipment, and medicines that cost so much. We don’t have a doctor shortage problem. The problem is doctors feel obligated to subject everyone to a barrage of testing so that they’re not sued. 

Lowering the standard for qualified doctors doesn’t mean there’s more supply.  There is no way to increase the supply of doctors without lowering the quality of doctor. People would still seek out the better doctor when the bad one can’t fix it.

Your thoughts on this topic are misguided, 1,000 spots in medical school or a residency program doesn't mean that there are only 1,000 qualified candidates. It means that qualified candidates cannot gain a spot in the program.

Here's a nice white paper on the topic if you're interested.

http://newcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/...or-Gap.pdf
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Trump's Budget to Attack Spending - by flsprtsgod - 02-07-2020, 12:04 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 02-10-2020, 10:09 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 02-11-2020, 07:04 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by The Real Marty - 02-11-2020, 10:14 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by p_rushing - 02-11-2020, 11:02 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 02-12-2020, 08:12 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 02-12-2020, 08:22 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by p_rushing - 02-12-2020, 01:23 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by The Real Marty - 02-13-2020, 07:12 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by p_rushing - 02-13-2020, 07:28 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by MalabarJag - 02-12-2020, 07:47 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 02-12-2020, 09:55 PM
RE: Trump's Budget to Attack Spending - by Kane - 02-12-2020, 12:00 PM
RE: Trump's Budget to Attack Spending - by flsprtsgod - 02-13-2020, 03:53 PM
RE: Trump's Budget to Attack Spending - by Jags - 02-13-2020, 08:28 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!