(09-11-2020, 10:53 AM)jj82284 Wrote:

(09-11-2020, 10:36 AM)mikesez Wrote: It wasn't incorrect.  A lot of it was correct. Yes, there were disputes.  The range of likely truth, at the time, included enough catastrophic possibilities that much more action was called for.
If an engineer tells you that there are cracks in a tension member on a bridge, and you need to close the bridge until it's repaired, but another engineer says, well there is a redundant member that will help prevent total collapse - yes, the science is disputed in that case, but a prudent government official listens to the more dire prediction and closes the bridge for repairs.

Airborne incorrect

6 to 7 times the flu incorrect

Not just old people (average ade of death 78,normal average life expectancy)

Unfortunately counselor you yourself acknowledged the IFR of this pathogen is roughly twice the flu not the 20 times that precipitated the lockdown narrative.  

What's the UK calculateforthe ratio of deaths from covid to deaths from lockdown?  Given the asymmetry in demographic affect, which has the gratthreat to total life years.  

Sill no answer on Cuomo.