Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Over Looked, The Hunter Biden Scandal

#41

Laptop from hell turned over to FBI.

I hear child pornography may be involved...
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

(10-20-2020, 09:08 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Laptop from hell turned over to FBI.

I hear child pornography may be involved...

Supposedly, a child porn investigator within the FBI is handling a portion of the investigation.
Reply

#43
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2020, 09:16 PM by mikesez.)

(10-20-2020, 09:05 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 03:38 PM)mikesez Wrote: Yep.

Brace yourself.  They respond to contradiction with mockery rather than introspection. You already know that though.

You'll find that people wont mock you if you argue in good faith. While I may often disagree with The Real Marty, he doesn't try to misled or misrepresent himself to others like you do.

You don't know who I am.  You don't know who Marty is.  All you have is text. What makes you think Marty is honest about himself but I'm not?
If you give me the benefit of the doubt, that I am who I say I am, what remains to indicate bad faith?
Do you assume that if I was in good faith I would accept your arguments? That's not what good faith means.  Our perspectives might be too different for that.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#44

(10-20-2020, 09:11 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:05 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: You'll find that people wont mock you if you argue in good faith. While I may often disagree with The Real Marty, he doesn't try to misled or misrepresent himself to others like you do.

You don't know who I am.  You don't know who Marty is.  All you have is text. What makes you think Marty is honest about himself but I'm not?
If you give me the benefit of the doubt, that I am who I say I am, what remains to indicate bad faith?
Do you assume that if I was in good faith I would accept your arguments? That's not what good faith means.  Our perspectives might be too different for that.

Hows your polling going?
Reply

#45
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2020, 09:27 PM by mikesez.)

(10-20-2020, 09:11 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:08 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Laptop from hell turned over to FBI.

I hear child pornography may be involved...

Supposedly, a child porn investigator within the FBI is handling a portion of the investigation.

The feds don't play around with child porn.  The arrests are immediate.  If they had a reliable chain of custody for that hard drive, and there was child porn on it, arrests would have been made long ago.
Either
There is no hint of CP on that computer
Or
They have no idea who added what data to it. 
Either way, it's a weaker story than you think.

(10-20-2020, 09:22 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:11 PM)mikesez Wrote: You don't know who I am.  You don't know who Marty is.  All you have is text. What makes you think Marty is honest about himself but I'm not?
If you give me the benefit of the doubt, that I am who I say I am, what remains to indicate bad faith?
Do you assume that if I was in good faith I would accept your arguments? That's not what good faith means.  Our perspectives might be too different for that.

Hows your polling going?

Honestly it's kind of monotonous, but your mom never seems to lose interest.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46

(10-20-2020, 09:24 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:11 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: Supposedly, a child porn investigator within the FBI is handling a portion of the investigation.

The feds don't play around with child porn.  The arrests are immediate.  If they had a reliable chain of custody for that hard drive, and there was child porn on it, arrests would have been made long ago.
Either
There is no hint of CP on that computer
Or
They have no idea who added what data to it. 
Either way, it's a weaker story than you think.

(10-20-2020, 09:22 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Hows your polling going?

Honestly it's kind of monotonous, but your mom never seems to lose interest.

Not sure what is more scary. That you abbreviate child porn or you know so much about the FBI process around it.
Reply

#47
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2020, 09:39 PM by p_rushing.)

Rudy turned over texts and pictures with the laptop to Delaware police. 14 year old confirmed. (Did he learn this behavior?)

Rudy is releasing info tomorrow. Alleges financial and other crimes are documented.

Person in jail has been moved and location is unknown. Emails are still on gmail servers, this isn't a laptop saved copy only.

Crimes also implicate Biden.



What are the odds Biden still shows up for the debate?

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
Reply

#48

(10-20-2020, 09:24 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:22 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Hows your polling going?

Honestly it's kind of monotonous, but your mom never seems to lose interest.

You’re like a little kid who keeps repeating a joke because mom or dad laughed at it the first time.
What in the Wide Wide World of Sports is agoin' on here???
Reply

#49

(10-20-2020, 10:18 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:24 PM)mikesez Wrote:

Honestly it's kind of monotonous, but your mom never seems to lose interest.

You’re like a little kid who keeps repeating a joke because mom or dad laughed at it the first time.

Ultimately,  it's his children who paid the price when that sense of humor was programmed into their DNA.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#50
(This post was last modified: 10-21-2020, 07:01 AM by mikesez.)

(10-20-2020, 10:18 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:24 PM)mikesez Wrote:

Honestly it's kind of monotonous, but your mom never seems to lose interest.

You’re like a little kid who keeps repeating a joke because mom or dad laughed at it the first time.

Hey, how's that wall you wanted them to build coming along?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#51

This is getting worse as more comes out. 1/3 of the 25,000 images are of the 14 year old and she is a family member. She is topless in some, with Hunter in some, and doing suggestive things in others.

Speculation is the 14 year old was his niece.


Since the therapist, Biden, Jill knew this was happening, they all have a legal responsibility to report it. The therapist and Jill have to report it based on their jobs with no leeway. Biden may have an out for not reporting it.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
Reply

#52

(10-21-2020, 08:37 AM)p_rushing Wrote: This is getting worse as more comes out. 1/3 of the 25,000 images are of the 14 year old and she is a family member. She is topless in some, with Hunter in some, and doing suggestive things in others.

Speculation is the 14 year old was his niece.


Since the therapist, Biden, Jill knew this was happening, they all have a legal responsibility to report it. The therapist and Jill have to report it based on their jobs with no leeway. Biden may have an out for not reporting it.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

The only source for this is Rudy himself.  Rudy goes on to say that the laptop has text messages on it.
Are you tech illiterate?  No one uses a laptop to receive text messages.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#53

[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fs3.amazonaws.com%2Flowr...f=1&nofb=1]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#54

(10-21-2020, 11:59 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-21-2020, 08:37 AM)p_rushing Wrote: This is getting worse as more comes out. 1/3 of the 25,000 images are of the 14 year old and she is a family member. She is topless in some, with Hunter in some, and doing suggestive things in others.

Speculation is the 14 year old was his niece.


Since the therapist, Biden, Jill knew this was happening, they all have a legal responsibility to report it. The therapist and Jill have to report it based on their jobs with no leeway. Biden may have an out for not reporting it.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

The only source for this is Rudy himself.  Rudy goes on to say that the laptop has text messages on it.
Are you tech illiterate?  No one uses a laptop to receive text messages.

I haven't really followed much of this case, but depending on the laptop and phone some people do.  Considering it's probably an iphone, and most people use iphones and use imessage, you can sending and receive imessages from your laptop and I believe it all updates real time based on your apple ID when you're logged in.  You may have to have a MAC to do that, but I know I've seen people doing it.
Reply

#55

(10-21-2020, 11:59 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-21-2020, 08:37 AM)p_rushing Wrote: This is getting worse as more comes out. 1/3 of the 25,000 images are of the 14 year old and she is a family member. She is topless in some, with Hunter in some, and doing suggestive things in others.

Speculation is the 14 year old was his niece.


Since the therapist, Biden, Jill knew this was happening, they all have a legal responsibility to report it. The therapist and Jill have to report it based on their jobs with no leeway. Biden may have an out for not reporting it.

Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

The only source for this is Rudy himself.  Rudy goes on to say that the laptop has text messages on it.
Are you tech illiterate?  No one uses a laptop to receive text messages.

Seriously? Do you not fact check yourself? It also works on PC and Android.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202549


Rudy may be the only named source, but he has shared texts with state police and the FBI is finally looking at it. The FBI tried to hide it, but now they can't since it is out there. Notice no one is saying the laptop doesn't exist, the images and texts aren't real.
Reply

#56

(10-20-2020, 09:11 PM)mikesez Wrote: You don't know who I am.  You don't know who Marty is.  All you have is text. What makes you think Marty is honest about himself but I'm not?
If you give me the benefit of the doubt, that I am who I say I am, what remains to indicate bad faith?
Do you assume that if I was in good faith I would accept your arguments? That's not what good faith means.  Our perspectives might be too different for that.

Of course I don't know who you are outside of this board. That's why I'm speaking about the person you portray here. You admit you don't even show your real self here, so why would I give you the benefit of the doubt that you're who you say you are?

Jeez, mike, this is what I'm talking about. I just said why I think you argue in bad faith, but you misrepresented it and make it something else. C'mon, man.

I'm not going to distract from the thread, however.

(10-20-2020, 09:24 PM)mikesez Wrote: The feds don't play around with child porn.  The arrests are immediate.  If they had a reliable chain of custody for that hard drive, and there was child porn on it, arrests would have been made long ago.
Either
There is no hint of CP on that computer
Or
They have no idea who added what data to it. 
Either way, it's a weaker story than you think.


You're wrong and in denial. 

The arrests are not immediate. They have to apply for search warrants for the devices, court orders for the service provides, and subsequent search warrants for the information given to them from the providers. Then they have to apply for more search warrants for any and all accounts found related to the stuff they find on the computer. You're simply uninformed about this stuff.

As for your one or the other, why then would Giuliani also provide it to the Delaware State Police and the FBI if it didn't have it on there? FBI can determine exactly when and where it was uploaded to the hard drive. Certain things can make it more difficult, but they can conclusively determine if it was uploaded before or after it was given to the computer repair shop.
Reply

#57

(10-21-2020, 12:28 PM)p_rushing Wrote:
(10-21-2020, 11:59 AM)mikesez Wrote: The only source for this is Rudy himself.  Rudy goes on to say that the laptop has text messages on it.
Are you tech illiterate?  No one uses a laptop to receive text messages.

Seriously? Do you not fact check yourself? It also works on PC and Android.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202549


Rudy may be the only named source, but he has shared texts with state police and the FBI is finally looking at it. The FBI tried to hide it, but now they can't since it is out there. Notice no one is saying the laptop doesn't exist, the images and texts aren't real.

Ok.  I've never used that app, never had an iPhone, never had a MacBook.  Didn't know they could do that.  Sounds dumb.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#58
(This post was last modified: 10-21-2020, 12:43 PM by mikesez.)

(10-21-2020, 12:32 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:11 PM)mikesez Wrote: You don't know who I am.  You don't know who Marty is.  All you have is text. What makes you think Marty is honest about himself but I'm not?
If you give me the benefit of the doubt, that I am who I say I am, what remains to indicate bad faith?
Do you assume that if I was in good faith I would accept your arguments? That's not what good faith means.  Our perspectives might be too different for that.

Of course I don't know who you are outside of this board. That's why I'm speaking about the person you portray here. You admit you don't even show your real self here, so why would I give you the benefit of the doubt that you're who you say you are?

Jeez, mike, this is what I'm talking about. I just said why I think you argue in bad faith, but you misrepresented it and make it something else. C'mon, man.

You're overthinking this.
You say I misrepresent myself.
But you admit you have no idea who I really am.
So how can you know I misrepresent myself?
You can't.
Just let it go.  
Treat me like the others.
All I admitted to is trying to be more deliberate about which side of my personality I would show here. I used the word "real" in the sense of "real life as opposed to internet forums" not "real as opposed to fake."
You (and many others here) are like that bad girlfriend whose subconscious malice causes her to interpret everything I say in the worst possible light.
Then you get even more mad, subconscious malice becomes actual malice.
Just let it go, dude.
Don't interact with me until you've let go of your anger.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#59
(This post was last modified: 10-21-2020, 01:37 PM by mikesez.)

(10-21-2020, 12:32 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote:
(10-20-2020, 09:24 PM)mikesez Wrote: The feds don't play around with child porn.  The arrests are immediate.  If they had a reliable chain of custody for that hard drive, and there was child porn on it, arrests would have been made long ago.
Either
There is no hint of CP on that computer
Or
They have no idea who added what data to it. 
Either way, it's a weaker story than you think.

You're wrong and in denial. 

The arrests are not immediate. They have to apply for search warrants for the devices, court orders for the service provides, and subsequent search warrants for the information given to them from the providers. Then they have to apply for more search warrants for any and all accounts found related to the stuff they find on the computer. You're simply uninformed about this stuff.

As for your one or the other, why then would Giuliani also provide it to the Delaware State Police and the FBI if it didn't have it on there? FBI can determine exactly when and where it was uploaded to the hard drive. Certain things can make it more difficult, but they can conclusively determine if it was uploaded before or after it was given to the computer repair shop.

A government investigator does not need a warrant to look at things that the owner of the property has already voluntarily provided to them.  The story goes that the laptop was forfeited to the repair shop, then the repair shop voluntarily gave it to the FBI.  Is that story not true? Why would a warrant be needed if that story was true?
Now, they may want to access Hunter Biden's apple account to corroborate what they're finding on the hard drive, and yes that would take some time and a warrant.  But I'm pretty sure reputable cloud services employ AI-sniffers to flag possible child pornography so that can be voluntarily turned over to law enforcement, sometimes without alerting the offending user

Regardless - these hypotheticals have very little to do with the election.  Even if you showed that it was more likely than not that Hunter deliberately kept revealing nude photos of a 14 year old relative on his computer, you'd still have to show reason to believe Joe knew about it and didn't report, before anyone should care.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#60
(This post was last modified: 10-21-2020, 02:52 PM by TJBender.)

It’s amazing how when a conservative judge is accused by a person claiming to be a victim of sexual misconduct, you guys become human shields. When a liberal politician’s son is accused by Rudy Giuliani of sexual misconduct and Giuliani has already issued an, “I’m full of [BLEEP],” clarification, you guys have the pitchforks, torches and hangin’ rope all set to go.

Wait, let me guess: Ford was obviously a lie from the start, but Giuliani making a claim about thousands of pictures of a family member involved in an affair, as absurd as the alleged Kavanaugh “gang rape”, is undoubtedly true?
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!