(11-06-2020, 01:20 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote:

(11-06-2020, 01:15 PM)Jag88 Wrote: Voters like healthcare they can afford or free if they cant afford it. It is whaat it is. I like the stock market too.  Not everyome falls into one party perfectly. Dont fall into the you must pick one side all the time trap. Either way, its time to move on to #46.

100% agree.  I am middle of the road as well.  I agree with Democrats on some issues and Republicans on others.  If you you agree with Republicans or Democrats on each and every issue of their respective platforms, you are just a sheep in one of TWO herds.

---

(11-06-2020, 01:17 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: The court doesn't consider things Trump has said in the past as reason not to consider a lawsuit brought before them. It would be irrelevant to the issue, and it isn't considered evidence for or against the issue. It would exclusively be on the evidence presented 



Trump did better in a lot of really blue and red states. The ONLY states he did worse in are swing states. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence indicative of fraud. These swing states have 20-25% increase in voter turnout with some states (Wisconsin) having an historically high voter turnout at 90%. The only reason you're not hearing about the voter turnout is because it's only abnormally high in contested states and advertising that to most people would raise some eyebrows. 

Why were there huge drops in Democrat turnout in the most liberal states like California, Illinois, and New York? Also, you don't think it's odd that swing states are showing huge difference in the Presidential candidate totals versus other ticket candidates? You'll see that, almost exclusively in swing states, the total number of votes cast for the Presidential candidate far outweigh the total votes cast for other same-party candidates. In other states, there may only be a couple hundred or thousand difference. 

You may not think fraud is happening, but you can't ignore that there are so many suspicious circumstances happening all at the same time.

You understand that the vote totals in those states are not even close to complete yet... right?  California has only reported 66% of their total; New York State is currently at 78%.  There is not the same urgency in those states to report their final totals because the outcomes are already clear.  So your conclusions about voter turnout there is ridiculous and premature.

You are clearly an emotional Republican clutching at irrational conspiracies to support your world-view to rationalize the loss of Trump's presidency and the dismantling of his tarnished legacy.  That's fine... but emotion blinds logic.  I know I can't change your mind with facts... I won't even waste my time trying.  So get on your QAnon website and have fun brother!  Peace.

Oh, please. I'll concede that the total numbers aren't in so the overall numbers will change. That doesn't make me "an emotional Republican". If you're going to project your own insecurities on others, maybe this isn't the place for you. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I don't believe in QAnon, I'm not a birther, but you do assume enough to make a fool out of yourself. Don't give me four years about Russian interference with millions of dollars spent investigating it and then tell me that election meddling is impossible in light of all the things they're talking about and showing in these videos.

But I supposed that makes me a conspiracy theorist to question how all these swing states experienced 20% increase in voter numbers while some almost achieved 100% turnout. That's completely normal.

---