(11-07-2020, 03:16 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Nothing I have said is evidence of fraud with regards to the election. I am saying it is suspicious enough to warrant a closer look. Forensic accountants use Benford's Law to as a tool to detect data manipulation. Basically, it's a rule that is good at predicting when numbers are being manually adjusted by people, not occurring naturally. It is not evidence of anything in and of itself, but it can set off alarms that tell them to dig deeper into the investigation. It doesn't tell the how, but it does indicate something fishy. That's what I am saying is going on in this election. Btw, when you apply Benford's law to the vote submissions in the same counties which I have mentioned, it's the only place where the numbers are off. It could just be a coincidence, but it should be enough to start a legitimate investigation, not just a recount.

---

I'm taking someone's word at that, btw. My friend that has been collecting this information with me is a data scientist, so he knows more about that than me. If it's true, we, as Americans, should be cool with them taking a closer look.