(02-25-2021, 07:30 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(02-25-2021, 07:16 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: You have no idea what their board looks like (and neither do I).

My point is that you’re calling certain players reaches when in reality, you have absolutely no clue if they’re reaches or not. You just personally don’t like certain players.

You are still missing the point and I'm not sure if you will ever get it.  Of course we don't know what their boards look like we are talking about what we feel like they should do.  It's highly unlikely they will have all those tackles at the top of the board when it's our pick at 25.  If they do feel they are the BPA then take him, but don't just take him because we need a tackle when we have other players rated higher that's sitting there like if their board was identical to DJs, they need to take Moehrig if he's available

I don’t think anyone is advocating for taking a massive reach on a tackle just to take a tackle. The positional value of a LT/RT trumps that of a safety. So when DJ has Moehrig ranked 16, it doesn’t mean that he would take him over every player after him. He had Chase Young as his top player last year however he said he would take Burrow at #1 if he was drafting. Why is that? He also had Nick Bosa as his best player in 2019 but again advocated for Murray.

Drafting players strictly off your BAP board will always catch up to you. You need to adjust, be fluid and notice trends that are happening. If the Jags draft strictly off BAP, then what’s to stop them from selecting Mac Jones at 25, Etienne at 33 and Harris at 45? They could all technically be the BAP on the board at the time.

---