Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trevor Lawrence's Contract?

#21

(05-05-2021, 01:36 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: Back in 2009 Matt Stafford was the last QB to sign a rookie #1 pick without the implemented rookie salary structure

This was the 2009 summary via google ...
"Matthew Stafford signed a 5 year, $135,000,000 contract with the Detroit Lions, including a $50,000,000 signing bonus, $92,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $27,000,000."

Google misled you. It truncated a very important detail: "on August 29, 2017"

Sam Bradford was the final rookie deal on the CBA without slotted rookie pay scale. Their numbers were similar, though.

Bradford: six-year, $78 million deal, which had $50 million of guarantees and a maximum value of $86 million
Stafford: six-year, $72M, with 41.7M guaranteed, max value $78M
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

(05-05-2021, 10:47 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote:
(05-05-2021, 01:36 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: Back in 2009 Matt Stafford was the last QB to sign a rookie #1 pick without the implemented rookie salary structure

This was the 2009 summary via google ...
"Matthew Stafford signed a 5 year, $135,000,000 contract with the Detroit Lions, including a $50,000,000 signing bonus, $92,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $27,000,000."

Man if 1st round QB contracts were really that bad back then, I see why teams would give guys a longer time to see what they could become. Thank god it's not like that now, imagine the cardinals if they had rosen on a contract anywhere near that and then had the top pick the following year, what would they have done.

Traded the pick for a huge return? Not like we have any example of that...except the 2012 darft.
Reply

#23

(05-06-2021, 10:08 AM)Mikey Wrote:
(05-05-2021, 10:47 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: Man if 1st round QB contracts were really that bad back then, I see why teams would give guys a longer time to see what they could become. Thank god it's not like that now, imagine the cardinals if they had rosen on a contract anywhere near that and then had the top pick the following year, what would they have done.

Traded the pick for a huge return? Not like we have any example of that...except the 2012 darft.

They would still be stuck with Rosen. That is the point, lol.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSIM9bZmkezB9B4qD2qAtT...IGQHCZIPuA]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!