Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
We owe the LA Rams a lot.

#21

(06-03-2021, 02:40 PM)Bullseye Wrote:
(06-03-2021, 02:38 PM)Ronster Wrote: that's it? hmm. How has Fowler been playing since?

In 2019, his first full year with the Rams, he had 11.5 sacks.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/p...wlDa00.htm

Fowler was traded in mid-2018.  He only had 2 sacks in that half season with the Rams.  As you stated, he then did very well and had 11.5 sacks the following year.  The following year (last year), he only had 3 sacks with the Falcons.  In answer to the original question, I would characterize his play as having been very up and down.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

(06-06-2021, 02:34 PM)TheDuke007 Wrote:
(06-03-2021, 02:40 PM)Bullseye Wrote: In 2019, his first full year with the Rams, he had 11.5 sacks.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/p...wlDa00.htm

Fowler was traded in mid-2018.  He only had 2 sacks in that half season with the Rams.  As you stated, he then did very well and had 11.5 sacks the following year.  The following year (last year), he only had 3 sacks with the Falcons.  In answer to the original question, I would characterize his play as having been very up and down.

A fair assessment.  He had his best years when he had lots of surrounding talent.

I wonder what he could have done had he not blown out his knee and had he played on a more talented team.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

#23

[BLEEP] the rams
[BLEEP] Ramsey
[BLEEP] Fowler
[BLEEP] Los Angeles

We don’t owe them [BLEEP]
Reply

#24

No the Rams owe Ramsey a lot of money.
Reply

#25

(06-06-2021, 06:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [BLEEP] the rams
[BLEEP] Ramsey
[BLEEP] Fowler
[BLEEP] Los Angeles

We don’t owe them [BLEEP]

I like your enthusiasm!!
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#26
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2021, 08:25 AM by Mikey.)

(06-05-2021, 10:41 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: We owe the Rams for moving to LA so people would quit saying we should move there.

Very this, but it brings up a series of what ifs....

If Shad bought the Rams, are they still in St. Louis?

If Shad bought the Rams, would Weaver have sold to Kroenke? If not, to whom?

If Weaver found someone loyal to the city to buy the team, and Shad keeps the Rams in STL, who ends up in LA? No way Spanos throws down for that stadium. Maybe the Raiders, again?

If the Raiders end up in LA, are we talking about the Vegas Jags (holds back a dry heave)?

(06-06-2021, 06:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [BLEEP] the rams
[BLEEP] Ramsey
[BLEEP] Fowler
[BLEEP] Los Angeles

We don’t owe them [BLEEP]

be more New York, we dare you!
Reply

#27

(06-05-2021, 10:25 PM)Dimson Wrote:
(06-05-2021, 10:41 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: We owe the Rams for moving to LA so people would quit saying we should move there.

Don't forget, if Khan would have won the bid to buy the Rams, most likely we have another owner and most likely the Jags are no longer in Jacksonville.

Weaver wouldn't have sold the team to someone who wanted to move it out of town.
Reply

#28

(06-08-2021, 10:30 AM)JagFanFirst Wrote:
(06-05-2021, 10:25 PM)Dimson Wrote: Don't forget, if Khan would have won the bid to buy the Rams, most likely we have another owner and most likely the Jags are no longer in Jacksonville.

Weaver wouldn't have sold the team to someone who wanted to move it out of town.

Maybe they agreed to keep the team here only x years? There is nothing in the contract for the sale of the team that says Khan has to keep the team here.
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSIM9bZmkezB9B4qD2qAtT...IGQHCZIPuA]
Reply

#29

(06-08-2021, 10:42 AM)Dimson Wrote:
(06-08-2021, 10:30 AM)JagFanFirst Wrote: Weaver wouldn't have sold the team to someone who wanted to move it out of town.

Maybe they agreed to keep the team here only x years? There is nothing in the contract for the sale of the team that says Khan has to keep the team here.

Khan doesn't have to keep the team here but if was planning to do it, he doesn't give any indication of it in fact, all evidence is to the contrary.
I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#30

(06-06-2021, 06:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [BLEEP] the rams
[BLEEP] Ramsey
[BLEEP] Fowler
[BLEEP] Los Angeles

We don’t owe them [BLEEP]

Seconded!
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!