Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Pennsylvania County’s Voting Machines Decertified After Audit

#1

Pennsylvania County’s Voting Machines Decertified After Audit

Pennsylvania officials have decertified voting machines in Fulton County after they were subjected to an audit following the 2020 presidential election.

https://conservativebrief.com/decertifie...SoVNKZmg2g
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

just the beginning.
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

#3
(This post was last modified: 07-22-2021, 06:43 PM by RicoTx.)

LOL

Just the beginning...

https://www.theslateonline.com/article/2...r-election
[Image: IMG-1452.jpg]
Reply

#4

I don't blame them. They are highly susceptible to tampering.
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2021, 08:23 AM by The Real Marty.)

It wasn't the result of the audit that caused them to decertify the machines, but rather, the process of auditing the machines, and the fact that they could have been compromised by the audit itself that caused them to decertify them.

The OP's implication is that the audit found something wrong with the machines, but that is not true.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(07-23-2021, 08:21 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: It wasn't the result of the audit that caused them to decertify the machines, but rather, the process of auditing the machines, and the fact that they could have been compromised by the audit itself that caused them to decertify them.

The OP's implication is that the audit found something wrong with the machines, but that is not true.

Did you read my link?  If this is being used as an example of 'voter fraud', he's proving nothing with this link.  This county had one of the highest percentages of Trump votes in PA.
[Image: IMG-1452.jpg]
Reply

#7

(07-23-2021, 08:33 AM)RicoTx Wrote:
(07-23-2021, 08:21 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: It wasn't the result of the audit that caused them to decertify the machines, but rather, the process of auditing the machines, and the fact that they could have been compromised by the audit itself that caused them to decertify them.

The OP's implication is that the audit found something wrong with the machines, but that is not true.

Did you read my link?  If this is being used as an example of 'voter fraud', he's proving nothing with this link.  This county had one of the highest percentages of Trump votes in PA.

Yeah, the headline could have been, "Pennsylvania County Audits Election, Finds Nothing Wrong, Ruins Voting Machines in the Process."
Reply

#8

(07-23-2021, 08:21 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: It wasn't the result of the audit that caused them to decertify the machines, but rather, the process of auditing the machines, and the fact that they could have been compromised by the audit itself that caused them to decertify them.

The OP's implication is that the audit found something wrong with the machines, but that is not true.

Right, because the machines themselves are vulnerable to tampering. They cannot be checked for tampering easily -- if tampered with, the votes can be affected and it's very difficult to determine it prove. So it is best that they not use the machines again -- there's no way to have confidence in them.
Reply

#9

(07-23-2021, 08:45 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(07-23-2021, 08:33 AM)RicoTx Wrote: Did you read my link?  If this is being used as an example of 'voter fraud', he's proving nothing with this link.  This county had one of the highest percentages of Trump votes in PA.

Yeah, the headline could have been, "Pennsylvania County Audits Election, Finds Nothing Wrong, Ruins Voting Machines in the Process."
Why can't they certify the machines like they previously did for "audits" and pre-election checks? If the software hashes checkout, there were no changes. They could have also had someone present during the audit to verify not was done to the machine.

It's just paying off dominon.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!