I've never read a more haunting piece in my life..... What's happening today seems to mirror 1938 Germany.....

Welcome to 1938: First, they came for the unvaccinated

This is the most important commentary I've ever written.

It's time for alarm bells. It's time for me to play the part of Paul Revere: "The communist tyrants and dictators are coming! The communist tyrants and dictators are coming!" They're coming first for unvaccinated Americans.

https://www.wnd.com/2021/08/welcome-1938...yfiK5OJ5sA

---

Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."

Too funny.

---

Good ol' World Nut Daily. The only place you can get Jew Blaming and Jews Were Persecuted in the same list of commentaries.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Some people are such "drama queens."

---

What do you mean guys? Didn't you hear him say "most important commentary" he's ever written in his life? And then said it 3 times.

And he's never read a more haunting piece in his life. Which means he thinks this is actually worst than the Holocaust. If this is actually worst than reading about it.

---

s
;

;

And in 1933 he went after the Communists, and the Liberals. The two people you blame in your posts.

So, actually he went after the same people you go after.

---

s
;

;

The similarities are haunting if you open your mind.

---

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

The similarities are haunting if you open your mind.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

And in 1933 he went after the Communists, and the Liberals.  The two people you blame in your posts.

So, actually he went after the same people you go after.

They were the reason the NAZI party even existed in the first place.

---

And in 1933 he went after the Communists, and the Liberals.  The two people you blame in your posts.

So, actually he went after the same people you go after.

They were the reason the NAZI party even existed in the first place.

You and your historical type learnin'.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

And in 1933 he went after the Communists, and the Liberals.  The two people you blame in your posts.

So, actually he went after the same people you go after.

They were the reason the NAZI party even existed in the first place.

Only partly.   The reason the Nazi party came into being was a lot more complicated than that.

I would say it was more about a big lie, that the Germans had not really lost WW1, but were stabbed in the back by politicians, liberals and Jews.  Then there was the ultra-punitive Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war.  Plus nationalism, anti-semitism, anti-Marxism, etc.  The Nazis took advantage of all that.  

But I would not say Communists and liberals were the reason for the existence of the Nazi Party.  They were some of the victims.  But saying liberals and communists were the reason the Nazi Party existed is like blaming the Jews for the Holocaust.

---

They were the reason the NAZI party even existed in the first place.

But I would not say Communists and liberals were the reason for the existence of the Nazi Party.  They were some of the victims.  But saying liberals and communists were the reason the Nazi Party existed is like blaming the Jews for the Holocaust.

This is a deeply misguided view, one that fails to understand the yin/yang relationship between the Communists and the Fascists.  It's understandable, because in the post-War era, the intelligentsia of the Left shut down all thought about fascism and basically made the word synonymous with "bad."  But fascism must be understood as a competing doctrine of the Left, a heretical variant of Marxism.  Just as Stalinism was not true Marxism.  What was unfolding in Europe was a titanic struggle between two different visions of what "socialism" meant -- that propounded by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), or the National Socialist Party (Nazi).  Germany's race theories complicate the picture -- but there was antecedent for those in Germany going back 100 years.  Franco, Mussolini and others lamented the way facism got blended in with the race theories of Germany.  


But it was a clash -- in the streets, the bars, the "pusch halls" and everywhere.  And people's justified fear and loathing of the Stalinist Left is one thing that pushed support for European Fascism -- which by standards of American conservatism, is a profoundly left wing model of government and society. 

The most important reason to understand this -- putting aside rooting for your "team" to be the supposed good guys of history and longing for the other "team" to be the bad guys of history -- is that what survived WWII is this idea:  the countries we call "communist" today are actually way more similar to the ideals of true fascism.  China is practically and ethno-state, but putting aside ethnicity its nationalism is strong, and it preserves so called "private enterprise" in the same way the Third Reich did.  Favored oligarchs of the party gobble up all the opportunity to make billions, so long as they are loyal the Party. 

American and the USSR teamed up to destroy the Third Reich, but its ideas about government have survived.  Fascism is the preferred "form" of communism now -- it was a reaction to the "worldwide revolution" that Marxists were supposedly for at the time (which meant everyone answering to Moscow).  No one anymore is for the one world government that the USSR was insisting on then (except maybe Cuba and Venezuela).  

The Left has now become the Third Reich -- they just figured out they needed to reverse the script:  instead of purporting to vindicate a master race, they needed to reverse direction and GO AFTER it.  They needed to claim they are vindicating the downtrodden (minorities, women, LGBTQ, etc.), because this appeals to the religious, virtuous impulse of the post-WWII mind.  Instead of going after the "elite Jews that are running everything and enriching themselves" (Nazi message), they've made whites the Jews also.  

So no, communists were not the "victims" of fascism -- they are the revolving butt-buddy of fascism.
.
Get over here on the side of liberty, individualism, limited and small government -- it's the other side from all that mess.

---

But once they attacked Pearl Harbor it was all over for them.

---

But once they attacked Pearl Harbor it was all over for them.

If Hitler hadn't declared war on the US after the Japanese attacked, the world would be owned by Germany.

---

Japanese? Huh?

You should watch more History Channel.

---

But I would not say Communists and liberals were the reason for the existence of the Nazi Party.  They were some of the victims.  But saying liberals and communists were the reason the Nazi Party existed is like blaming the Jews for the Holocaust.

This is a deeply misguided view, one that fails to understand the yin/yang relationship between the Communists and the Fascists.  It's understandable, because in the post-War era, the intelligentsia of the Left shut down all thought about fascism and basically made the word synonymous with "bad."  But fascism must be understood as a competing doctrine of the Left, a heretical variant of Marxism.  Just as Stalinism was not true Marxism.  What was unfolding in Europe was a titanic struggle between two different visions of what "socialism" meant -- that propounded by the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), or the National Socialist Party (Nazi).  Germany's race theories complicate the picture -- but there was antecedent for those in Germany going back 100 years.  Franco, Mussolini and others lamented the way facism got blended in with the race theories of Germany.  


But it was a clash -- in the streets, the bars, the "pusch halls" and everywhere.  And people's justified fear and loathing of the Stalinist Left is one thing that pushed support for European Fascism -- which by standards of American conservatism, is a profoundly left wing model of government and society. 

The most important reason to understand this -- putting aside rooting for your "team" to be the supposed good guys of history and longing for the other "team" to be the bad guys of history -- is that what survived WWII is this idea:  the countries we call "communist" today are actually way more similar to the ideals of true fascism.  China is practically and ethno-state, but putting aside ethnicity its nationalism is strong, and it preserves so called "private enterprise" in the same way the Third Reich did.  Favored oligarchs of the party gobble up all the opportunity to make billions, so long as they are loyal the Party. 

American and the USSR teamed up to destroy the Third Reich, but its ideas about government have survived.  Fascism is the preferred "form" of communism now -- it was a reaction to the "worldwide revolution" that Marxists were supposedly for at the time (which meant everyone answering to Moscow).  No one anymore is for the one world government that the USSR was insisting on then (except maybe Cuba and Venezuela).  

The Left has now become the Third Reich -- they just figured out they needed to reverse the script:  instead of purporting to vindicate a master race, they needed to reverse direction and GO AFTER it.  They needed to claim they are vindicating the downtrodden (minorities, women, LGBTQ, etc.), because this appeals to the religious, virtuous impulse of the post-WWII mind.  Instead of going after the "elite Jews that are running everything and enriching themselves" (Nazi message), they've made whites the Jews also.  

So no, communists were not the "victims" of fascism -- they are the revolving butt-buddy of fascism.
.
Get over here on the side of liberty, individualism, limited and small government -- it's the other side from all that mess.

The assertion was that liberals and communists were the reason the Nazi Party existed.  I disagree with that.   Liberals and communists were way down the list of reasons the Nazi Party existed.  The Nazis rose as a result of the loss in World War 1, and the reaction in Germany to that loss, plus the rise of nationalism, the existence of anti-Semitism, and the Great Depression.  It was a toxic stew of nationalism, anti-semitism, and the big lie the populace was being told about whether they were actually winning or losing WW1 when it ended.   

But I'm not going to go down a rabbit hole arguing about it.  I would simply encourage you to study the situation in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s, and the history of Fascism and the Nazi Party.

---

Nah, dude. Communists were doing exactly what ANTIFA is doing now, but far less subtly. They were attempting to erode national identity to being about a new era. The fascist movements in both Germany and Italy only gained power because nationalists wanted to push back against people who were destroying their country from inside. It's not an accident that Hitler went after the communists first. Also, you're failing to consider the overlap between anti-Semitism and communism, especially in the minds of the NAZI's.

---

Nationalism rose in Germany after WWI as a result of overly punitive reparations which forced a large percentage of Germans into years of abject poverty. It was a given amongst diplomats and statesmen immediately after the signing of the Versailles Treaty that there would be another war of reckoning in Europe in the coming decades. This is why Hitler forced France to sign its treaty of surrender in the very rail carriage in which the Armistice of November 11th was signed.

---

Sure, but that's not what lead to Nazism and Fascism. Have you ever read any of Mussolini's writings? Obviously there are multiple factors, but it was specifically the communist revolutionaries that "banded" the disparate groups together in Italy, which is what Fascism means. Hitler took a lot of Mussolini's ideas and used them to help shape his influence in Germany. Everyone focuses on Nazism, but Fascism was the precursor. And yes, despite the claims from the left, Fascism is a leftist doctrine. It was the only way Mussolini determined he could root out communism from his country. Hitler liked his ideas, but also connected communism to the Jews (and that is not entirely without merit when you look at the big influencers).

---

Sure, but that's not what lead to Nazism and Fascism. Have you ever read any of Mussolini's writings? Obviously there are multiple factors, but it was specifically the communist revolutionaries that "banded" the disparate groups together in Italy, which is what Fascism means. Hitler took a lot of Mussolini's ideas and used them to help shape his influence in Germany. Everyone focuses on Nazism, but Fascism was the precursor. And yes, despite the claims from the left, Fascism is a leftist doctrine. It was the only way Mussolini determined he could root out communism from his country. Hitler liked his ideas, but also connected communism to the Jews (and that is not entirely without merit when you look at the big influencers).

But if it weren't for the Treaty of Versailles... Hitler never would have gained power. Period.

And the funny thing is no one understands why WWI even frigging happened. This is the best explanation, by far.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEvuMhP2CuA

Honestly.. a group of moronic Serbians has dictated world history for over 100 years now...

---