(12-29-2021, 12:35 AM)Eric1 Wrote:

(12-29-2021, 12:29 AM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: So you are cool with..

No experience, guys who failed miserably prior and have only been good as of late because they are an OC for QBs who are headed to the HOF.

Hackett bro? Really. Yes let's bring back king bubble screen.

When all your QB can really do is throw bubble screens, that's what you gotta do lol. He did have Bortles after all. He was the OC for the 2017 run.

Packers have been to back to back title games with him as OC. Granted Rodgers has a lot to do with that, but Hackett is well respected by Rodgers as well as inside that building/locker room.

And Hackett, Leftwich and Moore haven't gotten a chance to fail as a HC yet so I don't see how you can call them prior failures.

I dont like the idea of bringing in a OC with a HOF QB, You don't know who's responsible for the success. Look at KC, all everyone was talking about the past couple of years was how great Mahomes is, while he's good, I think its Andy Reid. Reid seems to always get the most out of his QB's. Now that Bieniemy is calling the plays, Mahomes doesn't look the same. Why have people been calling for Bieniemy to get a HC gig? Same thing goes for Hackett and Leftwich, I am not saying these guys can't be good HC's but why? If you have an amazing QB does it really matter who the OC is? I would look for the OC's who make their QBs look better, who get the most out of them, like Reid. Find me an OC with an average QB doing great things, that's the guy that I want. Not the OC with a great QB doing amazing things. Take Caldwell, he did things with an average to above average QB in Detroit, or Pederson who had an average qb in both Wentz and Foles. Those are the guys who have done things.

---