(04-05-2022, 01:22 PM)cland Wrote: In all fairness, I want to see where the '83.8 catchable rate' comes from--other than a reddit post.  I checked the referred to athletic post but's it's protected by a pay wall.  What I could read seems to be a little off... as it's using a proprietary QB metric (ie. they won't share where they got the numbers.)

My general rule of thumb is that any metric that shows your rookie QB outperforming GOAT Tom Brady and the Superbowl winning QB should probably be taken with a grain of salt.

According to that article trevor had more catchable passes than Stafford/Brady/Russel Wilson and more.

Let's look at the real stats.

Stafford: 404 Completions 601 Attempts (67.2% comp)
Lawrence: 353 Completions 602 Attempts (59.6% comp)

I'm sorry, but you're trying to tell me the guy with almost a 10% less completion percentage, 51 less completions on one more attempt. You trying to tell me Trevor had 51 catchable passes dropped/missed MORE than Stafford, did Stafford have 0 drops and every catchable pass caught?

nah


Edit:

Just because I have eyes, and call things the way I see it does not mean I hate the jaguars, Trevor Lawrence, or any other player. The absolute only reason I even talk about his bad play is because I constantly see people praising him for nothing. Imagine this, Imagine all of last year every day you saw me post how good Taven Bryan was, constantly without reason. That's how I feel about the people riding Trevors [BLEEP].

---