(08-29-2022, 01:44 PM)iHaunting Raven Wrote:

(08-28-2022, 06:55 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: If we don't know yet, then the answer is still yes, because what would be the justification for the level of attacks that have been aimed at him when we don't know how all this is going to turn out?

You say, "lets see how things turn out before we crown him..." but the question wasn't "should we crown Baalke..."  The question was, have we been too harsh on him.

Ok then

Brought (or at least was ok with) Meyer.
3-14 record
Passed on Trent Williams, Hendrickson, H.Henry for a bunch of guys that did nothing. M. Jones was solid at best.
Trevor fell to him and still made him look bad. Little barely played and was nothing special. Cisco didn't play.

That's is Baalke so far, so have we been to harsh with him? no, with what he has done so far.
Also, I guess we are gonna ignore all the mess with Byron etc.

Attacks like the guy screaming at him to resign or like I think someone posted (on twitter, not here) his address? yes, that crap shouldn't happen regardless of what he does as a GM.

The TC meant us, the board, have we been too harsh on him? No

How do you know he passed on all those guys?  There was a rumor that we went hard after Henry but he chose the Pats.  Williams wasnt coming here over 49ers espically with the contract. We might have made a call though, we just dont know. With that said, teams done sign a bunch of high priced FA in the first year of a rebuild.

---