(05-16-2022, 05:57 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(05-16-2022, 04:36 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Lol, you're not explaining anything to me.  It's a bunch a rable.  You could probably say that for about much more than 27 backs over the past 8  years.  So he was a dime a dozen that you can pick up in any round or even UDFA.  Ok then, pretty much exactly what I was saying.

You spent 2 pages going back and forth defending Kirk as a good offensive addition claiming his lone 982 yard season as enough, and the kind of production we could use.   (which I agreed with) 

But a committee back who had seasons of 1077, 777, and 901 yards was "never good." 

OK, bud.

I dont really care about the numbers.  Just like I dont look at Yawns sack number and wish he would of signed that 19 mil a deal year.  No I dont think Yeldon was ever that good, if he was he would still be here or he would of helped another team.  I think LF is decent to good but Yeldon isnt close to LF and never has been.  Can agree to dissagree on Yeldon being good.  You think he was good I dont, he would still be in Buf. if he was good because they have been looking for a good RB for years

---