(12-27-2021, 04:20 PM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(12-27-2021, 04:12 PM)CanDoBetter Wrote: People like PFF when it confirms their biases. I'm looking forward to seeing what Lawrence got this week because he was better than the last weeks.

Other metrics work the same way. 

Using QBR then Lawrence is 28th and has only Mills, Wilson and Fields behind him. I'd say this means he's garbage compared to quarterbacks in general but not compared to the other rookies.

Qbr is a joke, Zach Wilson balled out yesterday according to it. It's not an advanced metric, it's just a stat.

Like I said, though, I'd be interested to know how much worse Trevor has been accuracy wise than would be considered normal from somewhere that's doing something more than just feeding raw stats into a formula.

How do you find out without using stats? That's kind of the point that stats are 'objective', and metrics used on all players are better than someone's feelings or eye tests. It's especially bad when the own fans grade their own QB they really, really want to be a franchise qb.

Right now the best case is that Lawrence turns it around in 2023 and becomes the next Josh Allen. Maybe he will turn it around next year even. Like Baker Mayfield.

---