(12-31-2021, 09:43 PM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(12-31-2021, 09:36 PM)OzJohnnie Wrote: If that's the case then you unfairly maligned UM.  Your judgement is so stained by your emotions that you shouldn't trust a thing you type.

Yes yes, it's not the guy in charge of signing the roster's fault that the roster has a severe talent deficiency.

I could care less about UM.  Never been a fan of Ohio St or Florida.  I'm making no argument as to the degree of good or bad he was as an NFL coach.  I am pointing out that every time you bring in a new coaching regime with the goal of turning over a bad roster then you are looking at a three-year commitment and you start over at zero each time you quit on the last guy.  The NFL has a 48-man game day roster.  Between drafting and FA you can, at most, turnover 10 guys on that roster with only five being impact players.  The Jags, by near universal consensus here, need a complete overhaul.  A near total roster refresh.  That's three years MINIMUM until the roster is turned over.

And now that's three more seasons until TL has a chance of a high talent roster.  And keeping the same GM who built this current roster.  If the defense of TL requires him to have great talent around him before he plays well then that defense will never be realised.

---