The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
January 6 Committee: Thousands of Interviews, Few New Facts
|
06-14-2022, 12:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-14-2022, 12:25 PM by mikesez. Edited 3 times in total.)
(06-14-2022, 09:16 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(06-14-2022, 09:02 AM)mikesez Wrote: How could any mentally competent person be sure that these people wanted to do no more than occupy the building for a few hours? "A few bad actors". Charges of seditious conspiracy have been brought. True, only about 10 people have been charged so far. Do you think these charges are false? Do you think they crime they are accused of is not serious? I also disagree with blocking access to the Supreme Court, thats also not a good thing to do, but, there's no allegation that anyone there attacked any police. And we already know the Supreme Court can work remotely. Broader picture, one guy is charged with planning to assassinate Kavanaugh, but he never attacked his target and didn't attack the cops protecting the target either. So how can you draw any equivalence? Ethically they are both wrong, but one is much much more serious than the other. Not attacking cops vs. attacking them Lone wolf vs. conspiracy Packing a couple of guns vs. creating multiple armories around town Deciding abortion law vs deciding who the next CoC of the world's largest military is This is sawdust vs. planks, man. I would never call it kayfabe but for the sake of argument.. can't you agree that this type of play acting is extremely inadvisable? That it attracts many people, on both sides, who don't think it's play acting?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.