The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
January 6 Committee: Thousands of Interviews, Few New Facts
|
(06-15-2022, 08:19 AM)Re mikesez Wrote:(06-14-2022, 10:11 PM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: Mike, if you've ever wondered why no one takes you serious when you claim to be a republican or in general, your zeal for defending the left (and now the media) at every turn and in every thread might have something to do with it. Just putting it out there. Some people have no self awareness. Not saying that's necessarily you. I'm just at a loss. My whole point was how, by and large, the media is essentially the propaganda arm of the democrat party. Anything else springing from my initial response is you dragging it in that direction. You claim you want reasons why you are wrong when someone responds to you. Don’t now complain when you get them. Hunter Biden matters more than Jared Kushner because of the obvious circumstances surrounding Hunter. For all intents and purposes he’s a deadbeat placed on Burisma’s board, selling his “artwork”, emails indicating a cut for “the big guy”, etc. Corruption matters right? Scrutinize the hell out of Jared, I don’t care. If he’s guilty of selling influence on behalf of Trump lock them both up. Foreign money in our elections and politics is illegal but not properly enforced and it should be with severe penalties including jail time. With Hunter though, there just happens to be a pretty damning trail of evidence behind him that you seem apt to dismiss or defend. That’s the difference. A media is necessary, but a heavily tilted media either way is a threat to the republic. I don’t care that the media is hard on republicans. They should be. If you can’t answer tough questions as a politician, you shouldn’t be there. What I care about is that they don’t do this for democrats by default unless it’s time to get rid of one democrat for another. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.