Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Roe v Wade reversed

#48
(This post was last modified: 06-25-2022, 02:13 PM by mikesez. Edited 4 times in total.)

Almost all abortions are performed on women who are already raising a child. These are women who have already gone through the sequence of pregnancy, nursing, the whole thing, and accepted it the first or second time but don't want to do it again.
We could knock out 70-80% of abortions if we just got the academies of obstetrics more on board with long term birth control as part of the standard of post natal care. The doctor should always ask, "do you want another kid?" *before* the kid is born, and *insist* that they plan and make appointments for an intervention that will prevent pregnancy after the kid is born. A vasectomy for the partner could be that intervention. A C-section can be the perfect time to perform a tubal ligation. Forms should be required going from one doctor's office to another so everyone is held accountable and liability is minimized. "I understand that by declining this procedure I am likely to become pregnant again while abortion is no longer a legal option in most cases in this state." It should be viewed as a necessity that prevents harm and death, because it is. It baffles me that so many states have passed laws about waiting periods, and forcing women to look at the ultrasound, and forcing doctors to say certain things before they perform the abortion, but none have passed a single thing with regard to actually preventing unwanted pregnancy.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 10:16 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 10:26 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Sneakers - 06-24-2022, 10:40 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by WingerDinger - 06-24-2022, 10:46 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jagibelieve - 06-24-2022, 10:53 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by WingerDinger - 06-24-2022, 11:44 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by The Real Marty - 06-24-2022, 11:50 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 11:52 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by The Drifter - 06-24-2022, 11:57 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by WingerDinger - 06-24-2022, 12:23 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Jagwired - 06-24-2022, 12:48 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-24-2022, 04:30 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by copycat - 06-24-2022, 06:46 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by rfc17 - 06-24-2022, 07:14 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by KingIngram052787 - 06-24-2022, 01:08 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jj82284 - 06-25-2022, 09:57 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by WingerDinger - 06-24-2022, 01:17 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by EricC85 - 06-24-2022, 01:24 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 01:34 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Dockerill91 - 06-24-2022, 02:24 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 02:46 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Dockerill91 - 06-24-2022, 02:49 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by flsprtsgod - 06-24-2022, 02:59 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Norman Mushari - 06-24-2022, 03:44 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 04:09 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jj82284 - 06-25-2022, 09:57 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-24-2022, 02:15 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Lucky2Last - 06-24-2022, 02:45 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 02:55 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Dockerill91 - 06-24-2022, 08:02 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 09:51 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jagibelieve - 06-24-2022, 04:10 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 04:15 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by MarleyJag - 06-24-2022, 04:32 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-24-2022, 04:39 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by The Drifter - 06-24-2022, 05:34 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Bchbunnie4 - 06-24-2022, 07:31 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-24-2022, 07:50 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-24-2022, 08:00 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-24-2022, 08:25 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NewJagsCity - 06-24-2022, 09:27 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NewJagsCity - 06-24-2022, 09:33 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by The Drifter - 06-24-2022, 09:42 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-24-2022, 09:58 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jj82284 - 06-25-2022, 10:04 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-25-2022, 09:37 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-25-2022, 12:42 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by HolsterHusto - 06-25-2022, 12:23 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by WingerDinger - 06-25-2022, 01:39 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-25-2022, 02:03 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Lucky2Last - 06-25-2022, 05:50 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-25-2022, 07:13 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Ronster - 06-25-2022, 06:18 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NewJagsCity - 06-25-2022, 08:19 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-25-2022, 08:40 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-25-2022, 08:47 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NoShoes - 06-25-2022, 09:55 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by americus 2.0 - 06-26-2022, 11:16 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by The Drifter - 06-25-2022, 09:59 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Ronster - 06-26-2022, 11:17 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NoShoes - 06-26-2022, 01:21 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 01:23 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by MarleyJag - 06-26-2022, 04:18 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jagibelieve - 06-26-2022, 03:46 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 04:33 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-26-2022, 03:56 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NoShoes - 06-26-2022, 03:56 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-26-2022, 04:23 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Ronster - 06-26-2022, 04:35 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 04:38 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by americus 2.0 - 06-26-2022, 05:18 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-26-2022, 05:53 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by MarleyJag - 06-26-2022, 09:08 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 09:24 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by The Real Marty - 06-27-2022, 06:07 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-27-2022, 07:18 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 06-26-2022, 09:27 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 10:10 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by The Drifter - 06-26-2022, 04:44 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 05:53 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by jj82284 - 06-26-2022, 06:42 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 07:01 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by homebiscuit - 06-26-2022, 06:49 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by JagsorDie - 06-26-2022, 07:08 PM
Copycat - by copycat - 06-26-2022, 08:26 PM
RE: Copycat - by homebiscuit - 06-26-2022, 09:13 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-26-2022, 08:05 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by americus 2.0 - 06-26-2022, 11:11 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-26-2022, 08:11 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NewJagsCity - 06-26-2022, 11:14 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by NewJagsCity - 06-26-2022, 11:19 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by mikesez - 06-26-2022, 11:49 PM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by p_rushing - 06-27-2022, 12:06 AM
RE: Roe v Wade reversed - by Ronster - 06-29-2022, 03:49 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!