The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Fact check: Militia law in 1792 included minimum weapon requirements, but no maximums
|
Fact Check This all you Anti-Gunners!
Fact Checkers didn't exist until the truth started coming out......... Fact check: Militia law in 1792 included minimum weapon requirements, but no maximums The claim: The Second Amendment reference to a 'well-regulated militia' was limited in 1791 to one musket and 24 bullets After mass shootings this year in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas, many turned to social media to advocate for gun control. Some users argued for weapons limitations to be implemented. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/fact...622309001/ ![[Image: drinks.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/Q7VqZJvp/drinks.jpg) We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.