Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Democrats fire up push for DACA amnesty

#1

They want those illegal votes!!!!!!!!

Democrats fire up push for DACA amnesty in lame duck session before GOP takes House

A federal court upheld a block on additional DACA enrollments last month

Democrats and immigration activists are looking to get some form of amnesty for illegal immigrants through Congress in the lame duck session before they lose the House of Representatives to Republicans at the beginning of 2023.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democra...akes-house
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

It's the whole reason why they don't enforce the boarder policies..
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply

#3
(This post was last modified: 11-19-2022, 07:57 PM by mikesez.)

DACA has never been about voting rights. DACA recipients don't get to vote. It does promote more "refugees" to arrive on a "forgiveness instead of permission" basis, but they don't get voting rights either.
DACA could be a good policy, if and only if it was combined with a tough "remain in mexico" border policy.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#4

(11-19-2022, 07:27 PM)The Drifter Wrote: They want those illegal votes!!!!!!!!

Democrats fire up push for DACA amnesty in lame duck session before GOP takes House

A federal court upheld a block on additional DACA enrollments last month

Democrats and immigration activists are looking to get some form of amnesty for illegal immigrants through Congress in the lame duck session before they lose the House of Representatives to Republicans at the beginning of 2023.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democra...akes-house
It's the RINOs also. They will vote with them. I wonder if Rubio learned his lesson or not.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2022, 07:30 AM by The Real Marty. Edited 1 time in total.)

Like most people, I'm against illegal immigration, and I think we need to get control of the border.  But DACA is about people who came here as children, who speak English, and who know no other country than the United States.  Deporting them would be like deporting you or me, to a country they have never known, where they don't even speak the language, where they have no home to go to.  It would be like the government grabbing you and dumping you in some Central American country.  Especially at a time when we have a labor shortage, to grab up productive people and throw them out of the country would not be a good move in my opinion.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2022, 10:54 AM by jj82284.)

(11-19-2022, 07:57 PM)mikesez Wrote: DACA has never been about voting rights. DACA recipients don't get to vote.  It does promote more "refugees" to arrive on a "forgiveness instead of permission" basis, but they don't get voting rights either.
DACA could be a good policy, if and only if it was combined with a tough "remain in mexico" border policy.

1986 all over again.

(11-20-2022, 07:11 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Like most people, I'm against illegal immigration, and I think we need to get control of the border.  But DACA is about people who came here as children, who speak English, and who know no other country than the United States.  Deporting them would be like deporting you or me, to a country they have never known, where they don't even speak the language, where they have no home to go to.  It would be like the government grabbing you and dumping you in some Central American country.  Especially at a time when we have a labor shortage, to grab up productive people and throw them out of the country would not be a good move in my opinion.

I don't know how I became so immune to emotional manipulation, but I thank God for it.
Reply

#7

(11-20-2022, 07:11 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Like most people, I'm against illegal immigration, and I think we need to get control of the border.  But DACA is about people who came here as children, who speak English, and who know no other country than the United States.  Deporting them would be like deporting you or me, to a country they have never known, where they don't even speak the language, where they have no home to go to.  It would be like the government grabbing you and dumping you in some Central American country.  Especially at a time when we have a labor shortage, to grab up productive people and throw them out of the country would not be a good move in my opinion.
They don't speak the language of their "parents"? Come here legally.

What about all the kids that have terrible parents that are citizens?

They can self deport with their parents or they can live without anything in the US.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
Reply

#8
(This post was last modified: 11-20-2022, 05:34 PM by mikesez. Edited 1 time in total.)

(11-20-2022, 10:52 AM)jj82284 Wrote:
(11-19-2022, 07:57 PM)mikesez Wrote: DACA has never been about voting rights. DACA recipients don't get to vote.  It does promote more "refugees" to arrive on a "forgiveness instead of permission" basis, but they don't get voting rights either.
DACA could be a good policy, if and only if it was combined with a tough "remain in mexico" border policy.

1986 all over again.

We've had "remain in mexico" for 2 years now.  It worked. This isn't 1986 anymore.
Side note: Biden is making a big mistake by not appealing for Congress to let him extend the "remain in Mexico policy.  It was started with the health emergency, and Biden does not have the authority to continue it after the health emergency is over, but, Biden should want that authority.  I hate watching football games where players leave points on the field.   That's what Biden is doing here. But Republicans may benefit, if they play it right. No sign that they will though. Kevin McCarthy has given every indication that he will investigate Hunter Biden and no indication that he will extend "remain in mexico"
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!