Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Supreme Court Makes Decision on Dominion Voting Systems Case

#1

Supreme Court Makes Decision on Dominion Voting Systems Case

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a case alleging that Facebook and Dominion Voting Systems had an illegal and undue influence on the 2020 elections.

The court rejected the appeal from eight Americans without comment.

https://www.westernjournal.com/supreme-c...R42ggDuLOQ
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Since the complaints are against Dominion voting machines in various states, i'm assuming this is the SC's way of kicking it back to the local State Supreme Courts.
"Remember Red, Hope is a good thing. Maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."  - Andy Dufresne, The Shawshank Redemption
Reply

#3

Next in news that surprises no one...
Reply

#4
(This post was last modified: 12-08-2022, 02:22 AM by p_rushing.)

(12-06-2022, 11:31 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: Since the complaints are against Dominion voting machines in various states, i'm assuming this is the SC's way of kicking it back to the local State Supreme Courts.
Basically yes.

They are still hearing the case about the State Legislation having the control over elections and that stops the dems from doing their mail in workaround cheating they did without laws being passed.

There is also the case from some normal brothers that actually got docketed for January. They haven't taken the case yet but will discuss it and decide to hear it or not. It's got close to 400 elected officials named in it and would remove them from office and forbid them from ever holding office again. It's a weird case for some nobodies to actually get to the SC and not have it thrown out immediately.

That case would open everything up but doubt anything happens as it's a huge impact and they won't want to change things even if they know the case law is correct.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
Reply

#5

(12-06-2022, 11:31 AM)NewJagsCity Wrote: Since the complaints are against Dominion voting machines in various states, i'm assuming this is the SC's way of kicking it back to the local State Supreme Courts.

That would make sense. No reason for SCOTUS to make any decision on what should be one at the state level.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!