(01-16-2024, 11:41 PM)nhiverson Wrote: Actually having an argument is one thing, but people here just attack when we have posted clear stats that back up and videos that he's not the problem yes he has to clean up turnovers but he is a franchise QB. I get sick of reading the crap. So many teams would take him if given the chance.

The problem usually is they are "adjusted for x" stats or "next gen" or some variant of reality like "stats adjusted for luck" bull that effects every QB. "If the sun's tilt was .02394 degrees different on Sundays, and the Earth's axis was .0454069 degrees the opposite direction, Trevor would have had a good game! ITS THE DAMN SOLOAR SYSTEM HOLING OUR QB DOWN! REEEE!!!11!!!"


That's how yall look. The reality is, when the game was on the line, or we needed our QB to go out and win/end the game/make a play, he did not play well. He was atrocious in the redzone several games this year, you can't do that if you want to be called elite, or a franchise QB. Franchise QBs win you games and make plays. I like to base my reasoning in reality, and not some fairy tale pseudo statistics like some of the nonsense you guys try to defend Trevor with. Did he win? Did he make the play when we needed it? Did he protect the football? The answer was a resounding NO too many times this year.

---