(01-07-2023, 07:38 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:

(01-07-2023, 12:03 AM)mikesez Wrote: You're a clown.  Toddlers understand winning and losing.  You remind me of mine, who wants to quit as soon as one move doesn't go his way.  I made a point, but you try to quit the game with a diversion to personal attacks.  You know what winning is just as well as me, and we've both won in life a few times, but we both know you're not going to win this way.

Sure we are and yes, toddlers do, which begs the question of your purpose when you post so that you appear not to. Strongly worded letters in response to this stuff? Nah, I want them in jail, and we'll get there if we don't react in your usual spineless way. And the more we expose their actions the more we expose their intentions.

(01-07-2023, 10:20 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:

(01-07-2023, 09:40 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: But isn't putting on a sexually explicit show in front of minors already illegal?  And if it's not, shouldn't it be illegal whether or not a man is wearing a dress?  Shouldn't such a law apply to everyone, not just men wearing dresses?  Is there any situation where it is okay to put on a sexually explicit show in front of minors as long as you're not wearing a dress?  

The answer is obvious.  This is a case of politicians pandering to their social conservative base.

Just as the left is increasingly sexualizing children to pander to their base. Can't one counteract the other?