(03-10-2023, 11:33 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(03-10-2023, 10:31 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: I know that's hard for you to understand

Buddy. You literally just said "take BPA but not QB, RB or MLB because you don't think there is a MLB better than Lloyd"

That isn't true BPA which is what you consistently scream every day. Bypassing talent because you don't NEED that position is a form of needs drafting and yet you don't even realize it.

You just created multiple excuses for why you would pass on BPA.

If you have a MLB at the top of your board in this draft when we pick you might want to revaluate.  All these years and you don't understand needs drafting vs. BPA is sad lol.

Oline, pass rusher, nickle corner I would put over TE and S but I'd still draft one if he's higher on my board. That's BPA vs need.  Taking a pass rusher or oline just because it's a higher need is needs drafting.  You don't draft a guy in the first that won't see the field.  All these years and you don't understand what needs drafting is lol.  Some want oline in the first because it's a huge need, its a huge need to me as well but I'm not taking one just because I think it's a huge need, I want my top guy even if it's at different position.

---

It's been said I know over 100 times there are rare instances you don't take the top guy. If a guy is that good of a prospect that is available when you pick and you're loaded at that position where he won't see the field trade back. It'd crazy you don't know what needs drafting is after all these years

---