(02-02-2023, 03:59 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:

(02-02-2023, 03:25 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: So much truth in this post. 

My career as an IT Professional is coming to a close.  There are some things I will miss, but one the things I will 100% not miss is data auditing.  Millions of records in government systems of cities and counties all over the country.  NYC, Seattle, San Diego, Phoenix, Albuquerque,  Philly, Columbus, Minneapolis, Denver, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Sacramento, SF, Orlando, Tampa, Jax, St Louis and KC being some of those cities.  What L2L is describing with his 'bump' theory is absolutely possible in these large databases, where up to 20 million records have to be audited.  There simply isn't enough time, and in many cases, enough interest to make these DB's 95 to 99% accurate.  Which means that statistically significant error can occur, intentionally or not.  Are Democrats too lazy too ask for accuracy?  Of course not.  If they were losing these close elections, there would be widespread calls for greater accuracy from them.  It's just easier for them in these circumstances to manage and manipulate chaos and inaccuracy than it is to exploit order and accuracy, which by the very definition of order and accuracy should never happen.

So Democrats are cheating, and Republicans can't catch them at it.  Which implies Democrats are smarter than Republicans.  Do you really think Democrats, the most disorganized and confused bunch in the world, actually have the ability to pull off a fraud of that scale?  No.  What Democrats actually want is to make it easier for poor people to vote.  And Republicans want to make it harder.

I never mentioned fraud, and it's your presumption that Democrats are smarter, not mine.  I'd say that Democrats are more motivated to increase voter rolls, while not really caring as much about the accuracy of those rolls.  They may be better at blurring voter accuracy and insuring that the legal system doesn't thoroughly investigate voter systems for accuracy.  Why would financial demographics have anything to do with this?  Because they are the 'party of the poor and disadvantaged'?  Or are they the party of maintaining the state of the poor and disadvantaged?

---