(03-27-2023, 09:22 PM)rpr52121 Wrote:

(03-27-2023, 07:26 PM)mikesez Wrote: Right.  
Rounds 1-5 we should see 
Two C/G
Two 3-point stance DL
1 CB with slot ability

5 picks, 5 players.  The needs are big enough and obvious enough that any deviation will come with weeping and gnashing of teeth.

I agree those are all needs, but with this supposedly being a great TE and middle round RB class, wouldn't taking one of those positions be reasonable?

If ETN goes down, the team will not win as many games.  But Hasty, Johnson, and Connor are still adequate to get the team to a winning season, as long as the Oline is adequate.  And it wasn't last year.  As for TE, it's better to have a great TE available, but there are lots of game plans out there, winning game plans, with no TE at all.  It's very hard to sustain success on offense with no RB, but much easier to sustain it with no TE.  Oline is more important than both, especially when you have a couple of question marks on the oline.

---