Trying to find the words without creating a five page disertation but I'll give it a go... 

I think I would split the 'process' of how we drafted... and 'who' we drafted into two specific topics.

In terms of the process i think it would be a fair comment that to a greater or lesser degree depending on your opinion we misjudged aspects of the draft or at least misread the room! It happens! But it is something we absolutely have to learn from, understand and improve for future years. To misquote my mother 'once is an accident, twice and I'll kick you down the stairs.'

Fortunately the beauty of it is even the worst drafts can be rescued if your players go on the field and perform. I can't comment on a huge number of the guys we got as I haven't seen em play a down but I felt we did some sensible things (Harrison) (Kicking a fourth on to next year) and a few questionable things. But theyre our guys now and I hope each and every one of them knock it out of the park!

The one thing I do hope with the prospects we did take is that Baalke and Pederson were on the same page especially over the first 4/5 rounds ... If those are players Pederson was keen on and feels he can use an envision within the system, (Strange and Johnson would perhaps be the example here) then I'm more than happy with that, ... Many sins can be covered as long as the coach and GM are in lockstep! And many disasters had if they arnt!

Skirted a few issues which others have done a far better job breaking down, but until something else pops into my head those would probably be the main things of personally take away!

---