Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Hillary must answer these 25 questions - under oath - by Sept. 29

#1

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices.  Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29.  On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….”  Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.

 

The questions are:

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room...tember-29/


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Of course, this won't be covered by the state sponsored media.




There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#3

If these guys weren't doing congress' job, where would we be?
Reply

#4

First, she will appeal.   If she doesn't win some sort of delay in the deadline, then she will submit her answers at the very latest moment possible.   Her answers will be so brief and/or vague that they will reveal very little.   Judicial Watch will have to go back to court to get follow-up answers.   That will take us past the election.  

 

So, really, this is just an empty exercise.  

Reply

#5

Quote:First, she will appeal.   If she doesn't win some sort of delay in the deadline, then she will submit her answers at the very latest moment possible.   Her answers will be so brief and/or vague that they will reveal very little.   Judicial Watch will have to go back to court to get follow-up answers.   That will take us past the election.  

 

So, really, this is just an empty exercise.  
 

Not really because it brings attention to the premise. Nobody actually expects a truthful or in-depth response to these questions, but the fact she even has to answer these questions is a optical negative.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices.  Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29.  On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….”  Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.

 

The questions are:

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room...tember-29/
 

Dude, she covered these questions during her recent press conference.

Reply

#7
(This post was last modified: 08-31-2016, 08:54 AM by HURRICANE!!!.)

Quote:Of course, this won't be covered by the state sponsored media.
 

The Clinton News Network (CNN) has gone a little more toward the middle in the past week.   I'd say they're on #4 below.

 

[Image: 6.1.5.1.3_SS_html_m405259bd.png]


Reply

#8

Under oath makes a big difference.  I expect 25 identical "I don't recall" answers.


Reply

#9

Quote:Dude, she covered these questions during her recent press conference.
 

Press conference? Ha, you make joke! I like it.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!