The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Baalke press conference set for 1/25
|
(03-28-2024, 09:26 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: My main issue here is the lack of spending a single top 100 pick on a WR but spending 2 top 100 picks on running backs. With a young QB, a smart GM would also have a young WR or two to grow with the QB. Not if in three seasons. He's had 12 picks. He couldn't even select one in each period. When you are doing BAP you can't guarantee in three seasons and 12 picks you'll fit one of those in there. The whole problem is the small sample size. You can say drafting receiver should be important but not if the third round receivers you didn't like as much as tank. Or Brenton or whatever. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.