Login

The Drifter · 05-23-2024, 05:10 PM

As Arte Johnson use to say on Laugh In......

[Image: very-interesting.gif]

Revelation of secret Obama-era program casts doubt on stated reason for Trump Mar-a-Lago raid

'The law protects only those who follow the norms of one party,' America First Legal Vice President Dan Epstein says

A purportedly never-before-seen Department of Defense memo from the Obama era appears to indicate the federal government already may have had original copies of the documents seized at former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in 2022, raising serious questions about the pretext for the raid, Fox News Digital has exclusively learned.

America First Legal, a conservative legal group, released Thursday what it says is a newly unearthed memo from the Obama administration Department of Defense "confirming the government may have already had originals of the alleged classified documents involved in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sham prosecution against President Trump."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/revelat...-lago-raid

The Real Marty · 05-23-2024, 06:03 PM

So you think it's okay to take classified documents, lie to the government about having them, actively hide them, and show them to your friends, as long as they're just a copy?

p_rushing · 05-23-2024, 06:56 PM

(05-23-2024, 06:03 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: So you think it's okay to take classified documents, lie to the government about having them, actively hide them, and show them to your friends, as long as they're just a copy?

Read what actually happened. Then maybe you will understand how the entire thing was a setup.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

snarkyguy_he_him_his · 05-25-2024, 10:09 PM

(05-23-2024, 06:03 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: So you think it's okay to take classified documents, lie to the government about having them, actively hide them, and show them to your friends, as long as they're just a copy?

So lemme ask you...

Did you know that former Presidents are allowed to have classified documents? Did you know that they have 5 years to prove why they took them?

Yes or no?

mikesez · 05-25-2024, 10:32 PM

(05-25-2024, 10:09 PM)snarkyguy_he_him_his Wrote:
(05-23-2024, 06:03 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: So you think it's okay to take classified documents, lie to the government about having them, actively hide them, and show them to your friends, as long as they're just a copy?

So lemme ask you...

Did you know that former Presidents are allowed to have classified documents? Did you know that they have 5 years to prove why they took them?

Yes or no?

A President, when his term ends, is not allowed to keep classified documents unless he declassifies them first.

If the law said he can, his lawyers would be using that argument. They aren't. They are arguing that he declassified the dicuments by the simple act of putting them with his personal documents.

His lawyers are also arguing that any document the President feels is personal is therefore personal, which is also not what the law says. The law has very specific definitions of what is and what is not personal. But his lawyers are ignoring that.

So it's not as if his lawyers are sticking to the law. They aren't. Your version of an argument for Trump is just too preposterous even for his actual lawyers

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.