Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Poll: Do you support extending the 1/2 sales tax to fund Jacksonville's pension debt
Yes - I support extending the 1/2 cent sales tax
No - I do not support extending the tax
I don't know
[Show Results]
 
 
Local Politics - Pension Debt

#1
(This post was last modified: 08-02-2016, 06:52 PM by Vicbow Rules.)

Do you support the plan to extend the 1/2 cent sales tax from the Better Jacksonville Plan to help cover the shortage in the city's pension debt?

 

If you do not support the plan, what suggestions do you have for raising the money to fund the city's pension?


“It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.”
― Albert Camus
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

No I don't.  Employers should not be responsible for people's retirement, that should be up to the people.  City employees should fund their own retirement plan (pension) through 401k's or other avenues.




There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#3

Go find the big money that was pilfered from the plan. Please go after the shady nepotism-funneled deals and whatever "waterfront" renovation project fiasco stole from citizens. I still can't hear the word "Shipyards" without cringing. And why was Citibank handed bailout money despite record revenue growth??


I could go on but WTH is the point anymore?
Reply

#4

Quote:No I don't. Employers should not be responsible for people's retirement, that should be up to the people. City employees should fund their own retirement plan (pension) through 401k's or other avenues.


The problem is, the people who this funds were promised this money when they worked for the city and weren't given the option of 401Ks etc.


We have to pay it one way or another (it's a legal debt) the only question is how we raise the money.


The last few years they have borrowed from the city budget to pay it, taking money out of the budgets of the city's park division (which cuts down on cutting the grass, replacing lights and other park necessities) amongst other city services.
“It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.”
― Albert Camus
Reply

#5

Quote:Go find the big money that was pilfered from the plan. Please go after the shady nepotism-funneled deals and whatever "waterfront" renovation project fiasco stole from citizens. I still can't hear the word "Shipyards" without cringing. And why was Citibank handed bailout money despite record revenue growth??


I could go on but WTH is the point anymore?
 

??? 

 

You're losing it.  The question was asked if a sales tax increase should remain to fund a project that includes pension for city employees.  I'm of the belief that people are responsible for their own retirement, not their employer even if it's city government.  I personally don't want my tax dollars to fund a city employee's retirement plan.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:???


You're losing it. The question was asked if a sales tax increase should remain to fund a project that includes pension for city employees. I'm of the belief that people are responsible for their own retirement, not their employer even if it's city government. I personally don't want my tax dollars to fund a city employee's retirement plan.


Better Jacksonville Plan. Do your own homework.
Reply

#7

Quote:The problem is, the people who this funds were promised this money when they worked for the city and weren't given the option of 401Ks etc.


We have to pay it one way or another (it's a legal debt) the only question is how we raise the money.


The last few years they have borrowed from the city budget to pay it, taking money out of the budgets of the city's park division (which cuts down on cutting the grass, replacing lights and other park necessities) amongst other city services.
 

Well my first question is, is raising taxes and/or keeping tax rates up the right way to go?  Are there not cuts in the mix that can cover the cost?



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#8

Quote:Well my first question is, is raising taxes and/or keeping tax rates up the right way to go? Are there not cuts in the mix that can cover the cost?


From my point of view, our taxes in Jax are very very low. Of course, at the same time our services, compared to other places my wife and I have lived, are also very slim. So maybe cutting from other areas could help a little, but we aren't talking $250,000 here or there, the shortfall is $1.5 billion.
“It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.”
― Albert Camus
Reply

#9

Yes for Jacksonville, no for the beach cities.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Eliminate public pensions.  Putting hundreds of millions of dollars in politician's hands is a recipe for disaster.  Convert all pension plans to personal 401k plans.  The plans are underfunded because the politicians made promised they couldn't keep.

 

If that means a retired cop gets only half of what was promised, that's still better than stealing more from the public.  Besides, a lot of guys put in their 20 and then work for another 3 decades while collecting the full pension.  Too many double and triple dippers.

 

Also, the rules make it easy to defraud the public and the pension fund.  If a guy's pension is going to be 90% of his final year's pay a lot of them will spend that last year getting as much overtime as possible.  So a guy who makes $55k can pull in $75k the final year and get a pension of $67,500 for life instead of $49,500.  He's not only ripping off the public but all others in the pension.


Reply

#11

If innocent employees were compromised by the actions of their executives, then yes, do whatever it takes to make certain they get what is rightfully due to them (which got lost through no fault of their own).   It sucks that the general public must pay to offset the debt but the employees should not get totally screwed.


Reply

#12

Just for the record, some of you know that I am a teacher, but I have an investment plan and do not have a pension.
“It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.”
― Albert Camus
Reply

#13

Quote:Eliminate public pensions.  Putting hundreds of millions of dollars in politician's hands is a recipe for disaster.  Convert all pension plans to personal 401k plans.  The plans are underfunded because the politicians made promised they couldn't keep.

 

If that means a retired cop gets only half of what was promised, that's still better than stealing more from the public.  Besides, a lot of guys put in their 20 and then work for another 3 decades while collecting the full pension.  Too many double and triple dippers.

 

Also, the rules make it easy to defraud the public and the pension fund.  If a guy's pension is going to be 90% of his final year's pay a lot of them will spend that last year getting as much overtime as possible.  So a guy who makes $55k can pull in $75k the final year and get a pension of $67,500 for life instead of $49,500.  He's not only ripping off the public but all others in the pension.
 

City employees don't get overtime like that.

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:City employees don't get overtime like that.
 

Are cops and firemen city employees?  I know a fire chief who did just that.  His pension is 10k+ more than he ever made if you take away that last year. 

Reply

#15

Vicbow - I commend your effort. Local issues - how would have thought?

 

However - clearly jagibelieve, Rashean and Byron don't have a clue (lol at least regarding this subject.)

 

These are legal obligations, people. Regardless of what we think about pensions, 401Ks, etc., a way has to be found to pay these legal obligations.

 

By the way I voted for the tax, although I think Curry has done a poor job of explaining how a tax down the road helps today. We really should be raising the millage rate and the sales tax - but Curry is a Republican and will apparently be taken out back and shot if he dares say "tax increase".


The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.
Reply

#16

Quote:Eliminate public pensions.  Putting hundreds of millions of dollars in politician's hands is a recipe for disaster.  Convert all pension plans to personal 401k plans.  The plans are underfunded because the politicians made promised they couldn't keep.

 

If that means a retired cop gets only half of what was promised, that's still better than stealing more from the public.  Besides, a lot of guys put in their 20 and then work for another 3 decades while collecting the full pension.  Too many double and triple dippers.

 

Also, the rules make it easy to defraud the public and the pension fund.  If a guy's pension is going to be 90% of his final year's pay a lot of them will spend that last year getting as much overtime as possible.  So a guy who makes $55k can pull in $75k the final year and get a pension of $67,500 for life instead of $49,500.  He's not only ripping off the public but all others in the pension.
 

Really? Really? How compassionate of you. If Hillary had said something like that ...

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.
Reply

#17

Extend the tax to relieve the current burden then change the pension laws for incoming and recently hired to self-paid plans.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

I worked at JEA for a decade before leaving for the real world. Anyone who can stick it out 30+ years in civil service deserves every penny of that pension!


Reply

#19

I'm all for doing something, but this plan is awful. Doesn't provide any real immediate assistance and kicks the can down the road. Have to vote no. Expected more from Accountant Lenny on this.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply

#20

A better plan would be to approve slot machines at the Best Bet and have taxes on that go directly to the pension.
Only a chump boos the home team!
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!