Create Account

Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums The Gridiron The Division AFC South Projected Starters


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
AFC South Projected Starters

  • Offline Bullseye
    Guy who posts a lot

  • *******
  • Posts: 16,905
    Threads: 1,188
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Reputation: 421
#1
05-19-2016, 08:47 AM

From NFL.com

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...for-texans

 

 

 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline HolsterHusto
    All Pro

  • ******
  • Posts: 5,572
    Threads: 40
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Reputation: 23
#2
05-19-2016, 09:07 AM

Wow, look at NFL.com, they actually nailed our starters without error.
Reply

  • Offline imtheblkranger
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 12,168
    Threads: 427
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Reputation: 344
#3
05-19-2016, 11:05 PM

Quote:Wow, look at NFL.com, they actually nailed our starters without error.


That's only bc DiRocco probably wrote our section lol
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

  • Offline Vino
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,230
    Threads: 266
    Joined: Jan 2014
    Reputation: 0
#4
05-20-2016, 01:07 AM

DiRocco works for ESPN.

"A man with no sauce is lost.

<p style="text-align:center;">But that same man can get lost in the sauce."
Reply

  • Offline nate
    Journeyman

  • ****
  • Posts: 1,144
    Threads: 5
    Joined: Oct 2003
    Reputation: 24
#5
05-21-2016, 06:32 PM

I still don't see how we have Malik inside and Marks not starting.   The position he was at is not much different then our 4/3 DE.

 

I tend to think base 90/99/97/56 is our best 4 up front with 91/90/99/56 sub package.

 

I'd see the versatility of rotating 75 at either left spot, with 59 being in play on the right- formationally dependent.  
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline DarloJAG84
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,401
    Threads: 103
    Joined: Oct 2015
    Reputation: 132
#6
05-21-2016, 07:50 PM (This post was last modified: 05-21-2016, 07:51 PM by DarloJAG84.)

The win/loss ratio predictions actually look good too...especially the 10-6.

 

Let's hope it comes to fruition.

[Image: 5S5POfa.jpg]

80% of what I talk about is nonesense.. the other 25% is made up statistics...


 
Reply

  • Offline DewtheMathis
    Banned

  • Posts: 6,498
    Threads: 98
    Joined: Sep 2006
#7
05-22-2016, 01:57 PM

Quote:From NFL.com

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000...for-texans
 

The Jaguars one makes sense to me (provided they are all healthy)..
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Forum software by © MyBB - Theme © iAndrew 2017

ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!