Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Best way to fix the O line in my opinion

#1
(This post was last modified: 03-17-2017, 06:00 PM by LukesUhJoke_lol.)

Going to make this super simple.

 

LT - Albert

LG - Rookie (2nd round)

C - Rookie (4th round)

RG - Linder

RT - Rookie (3rd round)

 

 

Simple version


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

 In a draft filled with defensive talent and weak olinemen your going to spend 3 of your first 4 picks on oline?  no thanks


[Image: mvp.avia8a99974486b2b89.md.png]
Reply

#3

Actually thats not such a bad idea. If you really want our o line to struggle
Reply

#4

Yea, start three rooks on the O-line. Brilliant idea.
Reply

#5

No.....just......no.


Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Yea lets make the line worse than it already is
Reply

#7

On a side note, RIP Russell Wilson.

Reply

#8

I believe the team is happy with all spots other than left guard. They will address that and add depth. No problem.


Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

#9

That would be by far the worst offensive line in football
<FONT face="Comic Sans MS" size=3><B><FONT face=Verdana color=#ff6600 size=4></FONT></B></FONT>
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Drafting a guard in the second round is a smart move.


The rest...


...not so much.
Reply

#11

Quote:Going to make this super simple.


LT - Albert

LG - Rookie (2nd round)

C - Rookie (4th round)

RG - Linder

RT - Rookie (3rd round)



Simple version


I do like this although I prefer a RB in there but if it had this way...


LT - Albert (second round) someone who can develop behind an aging Albert but who can get his chops at RT if Parnell falters again this year

LG - Omameh

C - Linder (fourth round)

RG - Cann (third round) someone to compete with Cann, but, if Omameh doesn't work out, he can gain experience there

RT - Parnell
Reply

#12

Quote:I do like this although I prefer a RB in there but if it had this way...


LT - Albert (second round) someone who can develop behind an aging Albert but who can get his chops at RT if Parnell falters again this year

LG - Omameh

C - Linder (fourth round)

RG - Cann (third round) someone to compete with Cann, but, if Omameh doesn't work out, he can gain experience there

RT - Parnell
I think there is a high probability that this will be the starting line. 

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

#13

This is an awesome idea
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

I can dig it...
Reply

#15

Did Beachum get picked up by anyone?
Reply

#16

Quote:Did Beachum get picked up by anyone?
Jets

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

#17

Guard in the 2nd and a tackle in the 3rd or 4th.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

I'm not opposed to spending multiple picks on o-line but starting them day 1, that's suicide unless it's Feeney and Lamp or something sick. 

 

We need some players on the o-line, it is the weakest unit by far. We got a 32 year old Left Tackle with injuries that's over the hill, Linder is awesome, then the rest of the line is terrible. 

 

Picking up O-line isn't flashy, and they won't be able to all start day 1, but with how we get injuries on that offensive line, how could we not invest there? 

 

If we are at all serious about running the ball and giving Bortles a chance, we must fix this line. Coughlin has said that he is focused on the trenches and when this team was in its heyday, we dominated up front. I think back to that James Stewart 5 touchdown day against the Eagles or the Freddy T/ MJD day on the Clots, Honey BooBoo's mother could have hit those holes. This team need an identity and when your quarterback isn't franchise material, that identity starts in the trenches. 

Calling Deshawn Watson a future bust since 3/19/17. If I eat crow, I will keep this in here and proclaim JackCity a genius. 
Reply

#19

Get a better qb. Line issue fixed.
Bleeding Teal since 1995. The Icon Teal Time Radio aka ctjags

  #Gojags
Reply

#20

Quote:Get a better qb. Line issue fixed.


Bro, we just became best friends. A good QB who can slide or move the pocket and get the ball out on quick reads fixes literally everything.


Kurt Warner did this with the Cardinals. They were a nobody until he arrived.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!