Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
We Want To Change The Constitution

#1


Liberals Are Fired Up And Finally Say What They Mean…We Want To Change The Constitution…WOW!!!
 

The liberals have finally uncovered what we’ve known for awhile.

 
They finally have the courage to say what they really mean when they call for more gun laws… No more guns… Period.

 

 

http://conservativepost.com/liberals-are...ution-wow/


Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

So one mid-level website posts an op-ed calling for a constitutional amendment, and you froth at the mouth?


I suppose it's better to change the Constitution than to ignore it, as your "build the wall and deport them all" nonsense would by denying due process.
Reply

#3

Can't put an Amendment in the Constitution. That sounds totally unconstitutional. What about my 2nd Amendment rights?
Reply

#4

i'm okay with taking away freedom of religion


Go Jags!
*To stay up for atleast 2 years 3/6/17
2016 draft players I think will be good
  • On the Fournette train, will be best back of his class 3/6/17
  • Lattimore please,  Lockdowns on both sides would be nice
  • Engram at TE and the MJD clone Samaje Perine
Reply

#5

Quote:i'm okay with taking away freedom of religion
I'd rather we not take away any rights.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:So one mid-level website posts an op-ed calling for a constitutional amendment, and you froth at the mouth?


I suppose it's better to change the Constitution than to ignore it, as your "build the wall and deport them all" nonsense would by denying due process.
 

Don't forget...it only takes one liberal to define the lot.

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

#7
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2015, 07:57 PM by copycat.)

Quote:Don't forget...it only takes one liberal to define the lot.
Well to be fair it only takes one conservative to define the lot as well.


Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply

#8

so the country is being infilitrated and the libs wantto take away our defenses. hey libs, you baby killing family busting tards, you are number one on isis list


Reply

#9

Smh this whole left vs right paradim will be our undoing as a nation. Your enemy shouldn't be the liberals or conservatives its the authoritarian that wants to oppress you.
[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

Quote:Smh this whole left vs right paradim will be our undoing as a nation. Your enemy shouldn't be the liberals or conservatives its the authoritarian that wants to oppress you.
I love you.

Reply

#11

Quote:I love you.
 

Perfect example I just had Fox News on the TV and that show Justice with Jeanine was on in her opening monologue she  starts off with there's a radical threat facing the nation to which the solution is for everyday citizens to be armed, at that point I'm like ok yes keep going, THEN she shifts into and be ready to give up some privacy she starts a whole speech about how I should accept NSA style megadata collecting and spying that some how my right to privacy should be second to some promise of security, she's an authoritarian!

 

to me the authoritarian that wants to disarm me is just as dangerous as the authoritarian that wants to monitor me. But conservatives see boogie men and default to bigger more powerful military programs which compromise individual liberty, and liberals see boogie men and default to disarming the population and more powerful legislation which compromises individual liberty.

 

We're being bombarded by authoritarians from all directions. It really is starting to feel like the options are all the same, just pick your style of authoritarian every few years.  

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#12

Quote:Perfect example I just had Fox News on the TV and that show Justice with Jeanine was on in her opening monologue she  starts off with there's a radical threat facing the nation to which the solution is for everyday citizens to be armed, at that point I'm like ok yes keep going, THEN she shifts into and be ready to give up some privacy she starts a whole speech about how I should accept NSA style megadata collecting and spying that some how my right to privacy should be second to some promise of security, she's an authoritarian!

 

to me the authoritarian that wants to disarm me is just as dangerous as the authoritarian that wants to monitor me. But conservatives see boogie men and default to bigger more powerful military programs which compromise individual liberty, and liberals see boogie men and default to disarming the population and more powerful legislation which compromises individual liberty.

 

We're being bombarded by authoritarians from all directions. It really is starting to feel like the options are all the same, just pick your style of authoritarian every few years.  
It's all about control. Conservatives want you to give up control of your daily activities by welcoming them to monitor every second of your activity under some false pretense of "security" that would make Benjamin Franklin barf. Liberals want to take away your means of resisting and control your thoughts under the guise of creating a perfect utopia.

 

Personally, I hate all of them at this point. The Constitution and national stupi--er--security are not exclusive concepts. People can own guns without being mass murderers. Not everyone who wear a burka, faces Mecca to pray or observes Ramadan is a terrorist, but some of those people are--just like some white Americans are terrorists waiting for the opportunity to strike. It's all just a dance for control. Conservatives want you to believe that giving them the ability to read your emails, listen to your phone calls, browse your credit card history, read your texts and stop you on the street to be searched without a warrant is a necessary evil that keeps the terrorists from blowing up the World Trade Center again. Liberals want you to think that if we all agree to be thought-policed and told what we think about other people, we'll be in some kind of worldwide kumbaya around the campfire. It's all bull. When you sit down and really look at it, liberals and conservatives only want one thing: complete control over you. They're just playing with different means of achieving it, but as long as people continue buying into the NSA crap or allowing DOJ employees to say that they want to be able to suspend the First Amendment, we're all going to lose in the end.

 

Personally, I think the liberals' means of control are a little more palatable than allowing the police state that Chris Christie, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush want to bring into being. I'd like to know that when I tell a cop to screw off, they won't be able to throw me against a wall and search me without a warrant. I'd like to be relatively sure that Uncle Barack isn't stockpiling and reading my evening text messages to my wife when I'm away on business, and I want to know that a tank full of pigs in assault gear won't crash into my living room because I made a joke involving a Muslim cleric walking into a bar. That's 90% of why I like Bernie. The other 10% is that Rand doesn't stand a chance. I'd sooner let a Democratic regime try to thought police us, because I believe that will be easier to push back against in the long run. NSA, FBI, TSA, CIA, state and local police surveillance would be forgotten or, worse yet, perverted by officials into, "Government surveillance shouldn't be a problem for you unless you've got something to hide."

 

Like you said, it's all about which authoritarian sect you want in control: the thought police, or the rights-are-for-the-elite crowd.

Reply

#13

Quote:Liberals Are Fired Up And Finally Say What They Mean…We Want To Change The Constitution…WOW!!!

 

The liberals have finally uncovered what we’ve known for awhile.

<div> 
They finally have the courage to say what they really mean when they call for more gun laws… No more guns… Period.

 

 

http://conservativepost.com/liberals-are...ution-wow/

 

</div>
 

Here are a few points some conservatives need to get through their heads. 

 

1) There is no such thing as the liberals.   There are people with all sorts of political viewpoints.   Some can be generally called liberals and some cannot be classified at all.  

 

2) Some liberals are smart, some are stupid, and the same goes for conservatives and everyone in between. 

 

3) Don't be a sheep and go along with demonizing "liberals."   This whole demonizing process is just a ruse to control your thinking. 

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:Here are a few points some conservatives need to get through their heads.


1) There is no such thing as the liberals. There are people with all sorts of political viewpoints. Some can be generally called liberals and some cannot be classified at all.


2) Some liberals are smart, some are stupid, and the same goes for conservatives and everyone in between.


3) Don't be a sheep and go along with demonizing "liberals." This whole demonizing process is just a ruse to control your thinking.


The proof that there's no nothing voters on the right is evident by the fact that Trump is leading the conservative caucus he's anything but conservative
[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply

#15

Quote:I'd rather we not take away any rights.
thats mostly my stance but with religion I am sick of churches not having to pay taxes or pity parties for religious folks failing to adapt to society.  You have the right to any religion but you do not get special treatment because of it.  

Go Jags!
*To stay up for atleast 2 years 3/6/17
2016 draft players I think will be good
  • On the Fournette train, will be best back of his class 3/6/17
  • Lattimore please,  Lockdowns on both sides would be nice
  • Engram at TE and the MJD clone Samaje Perine
Reply

#16

Quote:thats mostly my stance but with religion I am sick of churches not having to pay taxes or pity parties for religious folks failing to adapt to society. You have the right to any religion but you do not get special treatment because of it.


Yes we do.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#17

Quote:Yes we do.
ya thats the problem and thats what needs to change.

Go Jags!
*To stay up for atleast 2 years 3/6/17
2016 draft players I think will be good
  • On the Fournette train, will be best back of his class 3/6/17
  • Lattimore please,  Lockdowns on both sides would be nice
  • Engram at TE and the MJD clone Samaje Perine
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:thats mostly my stance but with religion I am sick of churches not having to pay taxes or pity parties for religious folks failing to adapt to society.  You have the right to any religion but you do not get special treatment because of it.  
I'm ok with taking nonprofit status and tax breaks away from churches, but I'm not ok with restricting the right of people to believe, practice and worship as they choose.

Reply

#19

Quote:ya thats the problem and thats what needs to change.


No its not. No it doesnt. No it wont. You have no right to our beliefs or the free exercise thereof.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#20

Quote:I'm ok with taking nonprofit status and tax breaks away from churches, but I'm not ok with restricting the right of people to believe, practice and worship as they choose.


You may not tax religion, period.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!