Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Trump Plans to Begin E.P.A. Rollback With Order on Clean Water

#1

As long as its not my drinking water right?

 

 

 

<p class="" style="margin-left:60px;font-family:georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif;color:rgb(51,51,51);">WASHINGTON — President Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Tuesday aimed at rolling back one of former President Barack Obama’s major environmental regulations to protect American waterways, but it will have almost no immediate legal effect, according to two people familiar with the White House plans.

<p class="" style="margin-left:60px;font-family:georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif;color:rgb(51,51,51);">The order will essentially give Mr. Trump a megaphone to direct his new <a class="" href='http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/environmental_protection_agency/index.html?inline=nyt-org' title="More articles about the Environmental Protection Agency.">Environmental Protection Agency</a> administrator, Scott Pruitt, to begin the complicated legal process of rewriting the sweeping 2015 rule known as Waters of the United States. But that effort could take longer than a single presidential term, legal experts said.

 

<p class="" style="margin-left:60px;font-family:georgia, 'times new roman', times, serif;color:rgb(51,51,51);">An advance copy of the order was viewed by The New York Times on Monday. It is the first of two announcements expected to direct Mr. Pruitt to begin dismantling the major pillars of Mr. Obama’s environmental legacy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/us/po....html?_r=0


Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Smart move.

 

This fake legislation has nothing to do with "clean water."

 

No one's water will be less clean because of this move.

 

Bravo.


"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

#3
(This post was last modified: 02-28-2017, 03:05 PM by superfan32.)

Flint, Michigan did so well under the Obama administration...Don't worry, Trump will clean up his messes.


Have you seen my baseball?
Reply

#4

No more fluoride in the water?

 

Cool.


Reply

#5

It's a very good start.




There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:No more fluoride in the water?

 

Cool.
Fluoride in the water is dumbest thing ever (espically since its main benenfit preventing cavities, can be gotten with nontoxic substances). Lets give everyone systemic flouride because topical flouride helps prevent cavities (even though its toxic). Thats like saying you should ingest botulism toxin because injecting localized Botox removes wrinkles. Its poison! Its still poison! Why would you ever ingest it through your skin and GI tract?



Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 
Quote:Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.
 
Reply

#7

Quote:Fluoride in the water is dumbest thing ever (espically since its main benenfit preventing cavities, can be gotten with nontoxic substances). Lets give everyone systemic flouride because topical flouride helps prevent cavities (even though its toxic). Thats like saying you should ingest botulism toxin because injecting localized Botox removes wrinkles. Its poison! Its still poison! Why would you ever ingest it through your skin and GI tract?
 

Nonsense. The dose makes the poison. The small amount of fluoride cities put in drinking water is harmless. People living in cities are not dying younger than people living in rural areas (at least when race and lifestyle are taken into account).


 

Whether it actually does prevent cavities is another matter, but it's harmless.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#8

Fluoride is pointless and shouldn't be put in water.
Reply

#9

Prior to now, EPA would have considered this a "navigable waterway:"

 

 

[Image: C5yrE_TWcAEPEWs.jpg]

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10
(This post was last modified: 03-02-2017, 02:04 AM by HandsomeRob86.)

Quote:Nonsense. The dose makes the poison. The small amount of fluoride cities put in drinking water is harmless. People living in cities are not dying younger than people living in rural areas (at least when race and lifestyle are taken into account).


 

Whether it actually does prevent cavities is another matter, but it's harmless.
Its not harmless to children at which the toxic dose becomes much smaller. And which is easily absorbed through their skin while bathing. Should we add arsenic to the water because in low enough doses it doesn't cause acute disease? Nonsense, nonsense, nonsense. I shouldn't have to filter out a medication (loosely using that term with fluoride, cause I don't think its beneficial at all) from a water supply.

 

If you want Fluoride in your water, you should add it yourself. Don't force me (especially as a renter) to have it in my supply just because some dentist thought it was a good idea in the 60's.

 

Quote:Fluoride is pointless and shouldn't be put in water.
This is one of the few times I want to be in other countries is when we talk about food and water. We get the shaft here in the US and people defend it.




Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster

http://youtu.be/ouGM3NWpjxk The Home Hypnotist!

http://youtu.be/XQRFkn0Ly3A Media on the Brain Link!
 
Quote:Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.
 
Reply

#11

Quote:Flint, Michigan did so well under the Obama administration...Don't worry, Trump will clean up his messes.


Obama has nothing to do with the Flint water crisis and didn't have the authority to get involved. That is all on Governor Snyder.
Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.
Reply

#12

Quote:Obama has nothing to do with the Flint water crisis and didn't have the authority to get involved. That is all on Governor Snyder.


Yeah, just like Katrina. Clearly Obama hates black people.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#13

Quote:Yeah, just like Katrina. Clearly Obama hates black people.
 

LOL.  The left will never get it.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14
(This post was last modified: 03-02-2017, 07:16 PM by JackCity.)

Quote:Its not harmless to children at which the toxic dose becomes much smaller. And which is easily absorbed through their skin while bathing. Should we add arsenic to the water because in low enough doses it doesn't cause acute disease? Nonsense, nonsense, nonsense. I shouldn't have to filter out a medication (loosely using that term with fluoride, cause I don't think its beneficial at all) from a water supply.

 

If you want Fluoride in your water, you should add it yourself. Don't force me (especially as a renter) to have it in my supply just because some dentist thought it was a good idea in the 60's.

 

This is one of the few times I want to be in other countries is when we talk about food and water. We get the shaft here in the US and people defend it.
Its the same here man. Its added to 70% of the water in Ireland. The issue comes up every few years but it seems its one of those things that has been done for so long most just kind of go with it so it stays.

 

Not to mention they put enough flouride in toothpaste anyway. 


Reply

#15

Back on topic, the water was perfectly safe under the old regulations, a new one didn't need to be added. That's the problem with the EPA, very few are actually in the field protecting the air and water. Most of them have nothing to do but make up new expensive regulations that have no effect on the environment.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

#16

Quote:Back on topic, the water was perfectly safe under the old regulations, a new one didn't need to be added. That's the problem with the EPA, very few are actually in the field protecting the air and water. Most of them have nothing to do but make up new expensive regulations that have no effect on the environment.
Something to consider:

 

  I work in an environment that has 3 different audit teams visit each and every year.  All three are in part of the federal government.  One directly, two quasi however those two strictly follow the federal guide lines.  All 3 audit teams will find fault with the operation, often times contradicting each other.  My point is an audit team will always find fault with some aspect of the operation to justify the need of the audit team.  Far too often to the extreme of contradicting a positive from a previous audit to finding fault on the current audit.  

 

  The point that I am attempting to make is if a department or agency is relying on funds based on finding fault that they will always find fault.  

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply

#17
(This post was last modified: 03-03-2017, 04:07 PM by Solid Snake.)

Quote:Something to consider:


I work in an environment that has 3 different audit teams visit each and every year. All three are in part of the federal government. One directly, two quasi however those two strictly follow the federal guide lines. All 3 audit teams will find fault with the operation, often times contradicting each other. My point is an audit team will always find fault with some aspect of the operation to justify the need of the audit team. Far too often to the extreme of contradicting a positive from a previous audit to finding fault on the current audit.


The point that I am attempting to make is if a department or agency is relying on funds based on finding fault that they will always find fault.
Yea cops always find crime

Firefighters always find fires

Doctors always find sickness


I wish funding would be cut for everybody that's supposed to find things that is part of their job description and enables them to keep working. These people are so selfish finding things that they are supposed to fine.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#18

Quote:Yea cops always find crime

Firefighters always find fires

Doctors always find sickness
 

I don't want to divert from the subject matter too much, but I don't understand the logic behind this comment.

 

Cops don't create the crime. Firefighters don't create the fires. Doctors don't create the sickness.

 

You can't cut funding and expect better performing employees. In other words, you can't have overly qualified cops and firefighters when you're only willing to pay them the bare minimum. There's this idea that they should be well trained (I agree), but you can't cut funding and expect all of that to still work out.

Reply

#19

Quote:Yea cops always find crime

Firefighters always find fires

Doctors always find sickness


I wish funding would be cut for everybody that's supposed to find things that is part of their job description and enables them to keep working. These people are so selfish finding things that they are supposed to fine.
I have gone out of my way to keep an open mind and show respect to each and every poster.  You however have exceeded my capability to do so with this post.  You are either so far up the lefts [BLEEP] that you will defend whatever they tell you to or are willfully being a complete jerk.  The sad part is I think you are capable of forming your own thoughts but are unwilling to do so.

Original Season Ticket Holder - Retired  1995 - 2020


At some point you just have to let go of what you thought should happen and live in what is happening.
 

Reply

#20

I catch flack for not appearing to be civil with some, but this is the reason it appears that way.  I've already experienced the discussions with them and post history has shown me the poster(s) where civility and logic will/will not have any effect.  Respect was not earned by their posts.

 

He's just upset that the fraudulent work he's lined his pockets with may disappear when clearer heads prevail.  Better to face reality than live a lie that enriches you.  It's a house of cards that's able to come crashing down at any given moment.


"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!